@DurryMexted said in Super Rugby - The Future:
@Dan54 said in Super Rugby - The Future:
@DurryMexted said in Super Rugby - The Future:
@Dan54 said in Super Rugby - The Future:
One thing I do wonder , NZ rugby (rightly in my opinion) say you don't play for NZ teams you don't play for ABs. And we get a few people saying our players should be able to play in Aus teams, I say bollocks, they want to let their top players go overseas and still play for Wallabies, they can't expect NZ to fill up gaps.
Yeah its way better having talented guys sitting in the stands not playing at all aye. And then going to europe to play and ripping up.
You think Aus super teams will pay enough to stop players going to Europe?
If that the case why not pay their top players to stay home, or buy them from Europe. I not sure what answer is (well the answer is there, but unplatable) so I guess we have to keep working on it.
AS others have touched on - providing this option is in essence a lifestyle bonus - and likely be a pay rise anyway if they move from a squad member to a starter. Ive touched previously that we have 5 no. 10 jerseys to offer players each year, usually 3 of these are taken by incumbent all blacks. So 2 first fives get a crack each year. Even just an extra NZ first five getting to start each week would be a massive bonus to our depth and development as a nation - without losing a guy to Europe or Japan
Everyone has good points, although I think in long term if Aussie thinks importing players from NZ to play super ,I genuinely think it will hurt the Wallabies. The thing is in your example say 2 spare 10s go to Aus super teams, that's 2 Aussie 10s missing a chance to develop, and it's not going to be long before the Wallabies will pay the price. Could be good for Aus super teams, but will damage their test team, and that's where they get main support etc for the game. And knowing supporters in a few years they will be asking why their young players are going to NRL etc again.