Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

SF Crusaders v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
crusadersblues
524 Posts 57 Posters 8.4k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #1

    Never lost a home playoff game. That’s some stat.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      SBW1
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Last game the Blues played in Christchurch really went down to the wire. How are the Saders going troopwise?

      1kiwi1 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S SBW1

        Last game the Blues played in Christchurch really went down to the wire. How are the Saders going troopwise?

        1kiwi1 Offline
        1kiwi1 Offline
        1kiwi
        wrote on last edited by 1kiwi
        #3

        @SBW1 said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

        Last game the Blues played in Christchurch really went down to the wire. How are the Saders going troopwise?

        Tamaiti Williams is their biggest concern after coming off in the win against the Reds with a knee problem. Don't believe there has been any news as to what the issue is but it didn't look good. Would be a big loss.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          African Monkey
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Good position for the Blues to be in. Heavy underdogs, a horrible record in Chch, barely scraped to the playoffs after a very mediocre round robin, already gone a lot further than anyone thought they would say 6 weeks go so yeah, a free hit here for the Blues with nothing to lose (apart from the game of course).

          DuluthD canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
          8
          • A African Monkey

            Good position for the Blues to be in. Heavy underdogs, a horrible record in Chch, barely scraped to the playoffs after a very mediocre round robin, already gone a lot further than anyone thought they would say 6 weeks go so yeah, a free hit here for the Blues with nothing to lose (apart from the game of course).

            DuluthD Offline
            DuluthD Offline
            Duluth
            wrote on last edited by Duluth
            #5

            @African-Monkey said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

            a free hit here for the Blues with nothing to lose (apart from the game of course)

            Yup. Exactly like it was vs the Chiefs this week

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • A African Monkey

              Good position for the Blues to be in. Heavy underdogs, a horrible record in Chch, barely scraped to the playoffs after a very mediocre round robin, already gone a lot further than anyone thought they would say 6 weeks go so yeah, a free hit here for the Blues with nothing to lose (apart from the game of course).

              canefanC Offline
              canefanC Offline
              canefan
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @African-Monkey said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

              Good position for the Blues to be in. Heavy underdogs, a horrible record in Chch, barely scraped to the playoffs after a very mediocre round robin, already gone a lot further than anyone thought they would say 6 weeks go so yeah, a free hit here for the Blues with nothing to lose (apart from the game of course).

              And a few players with chips on their shoulders. They are playing with house money

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT Crusader
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Saders have already overachieved this season by just being in the finals after finishing 9th last year with pretty much the same team.

                And now we face the defending champions in a semi final.

                No expectations from here on in.

                A B Landers92L 3 Replies Last reply
                7
                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                  Saders have already overachieved this season by just being in the finals after finishing 9th last year with pretty much the same team.

                  And now we face the defending champions in a semi final.

                  No expectations from here on in.

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  African Monkey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                  Saders have already overachieved this season by just being in the finals after finishing 9th last year with pretty much the same team.

                  And now we face the defending champions in a semi final.

                  No expectations from here on in.

                  I thought last year never happened......

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                    Saders have already overachieved this season by just being in the finals after finishing 9th last year with pretty much the same team.

                    And now we face the defending champions in a semi final.

                    No expectations from here on in.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    brodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                    Saders have already overachieved this season by just being in the finals after finishing 9th last year with pretty much the same team.

                    And now we face the defending champions in a semi final.

                    No expectations from here on in.

                    Crusaders have never lost a home semi. There will be an expectation to win for the team.

                    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Frank
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Blues would have taken a shit ton of self belief from the Chiefs game. They'll believe they can do it again.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • nzzpN Offline
                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        hahaha, Crusaders supporters starting to talk down their team's chances.

                        We've won once there in forever.
                        Never lost a home playoff game.
                        Blues have stunk up the joint this year.

                        Seriously, stop the race to the underdog ... TAB has Blues at $2.70 to win and that seems about right

                        ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          brodean
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          I think this could be a very big match for Christian Lio-Willie. I suspect if he plays well in this game and the Crusaders win then he could be named on the 23rd.

                          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • B brodean

                            I think this could be a very big match for Christian Lio-Willie. I suspect if he plays well in this game and the Crusaders win then he could be named on the 23rd.

                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            @brodean same should apply to Sotutu, who started slowly but has built into things nicely, playing a key role on Saturday.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                              @brodean same should apply to Sotutu, who started slowly but has built into things nicely, playing a key role on Saturday.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              reprobate
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                              @brodean same should apply to Sotutu, who started slowly but has built into things nicely, playing a key role on Saturday.

                              I still hold out hope that his slow start to the season (although there were both injury and suspension) was due to the ABs telling him he was in and to pace himself to peak late like the incumbent ABs do, rather than going hell for leather all Super season and standing out but then being knackered at test time (and yeah I do know I'm delusional).

                              Hoping to see a strong performance from Lam to push his case too. And Blackadder so I can enjoy the wailing of the naysayers on here.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • nzzpN nzzp

                                hahaha, Crusaders supporters starting to talk down their team's chances.

                                We've won once there in forever.
                                Never lost a home playoff game.
                                Blues have stunk up the joint this year.

                                Seriously, stop the race to the underdog ... TAB has Blues at $2.70 to win and that seems about right

                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
                                #15

                                @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                                hahaha, Crusaders supporters starting to talk down their team's chances.

                                We've won once there in forever.
                                Never lost a home playoff game.
                                Blues have stunk up the joint this year.

                                Seriously, stop the race to the underdog ... TAB has Blues at $2.70 to win and that seems about right

                                I fully expect a Blues win.

                                nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                                  hahaha, Crusaders supporters starting to talk down their team's chances.

                                  We've won once there in forever.
                                  Never lost a home playoff game.
                                  Blues have stunk up the joint this year.

                                  Seriously, stop the race to the underdog ... TAB has Blues at $2.70 to win and that seems about right

                                  I fully expect a Blues win.

                                  nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                                  @nzzp said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                                  hahaha, Crusaders supporters starting to talk down their team's chances.

                                  We've won once there in forever.
                                  Never lost a home playoff game.
                                  Blues have stunk up the joint this year.

                                  Seriously, stop the race to the underdog ... TAB has Blues at $2.70 to win and that seems about right

                                  I fully expect a Blues win.

                                  Loss insurance!!!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    brodean
                                    wrote on last edited by brodean
                                    #17

                                    Any news on Williams injury?

                                    He's basically the Crusaders and the ABs best player. Well there is Savea for the ABs.

                                    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • B brodean

                                      Any news on Williams injury?

                                      He's basically the Crusaders and the ABs best player. Well there is Savea for the ABs.

                                      Canes4lifeC Offline
                                      Canes4lifeC Offline
                                      Canes4life
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @brodean said in Crusaders v Blues (SF):

                                      Any news on Williams injury?

                                      He's basically the Crusaders and the ABs best player. Well there is Savea for the ABs.

                                      And Blackadder

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • nostrildamusN Offline
                                        nostrildamusN Offline
                                        nostrildamus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Blackadder must have the highest ratio of times he is mentioned on here to minutes "actually" playing of any current player.
                                        Good luck to him.

                                        Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                                          Blackadder must have the highest ratio of times he is mentioned on here to minutes "actually" playing of any current player.
                                          Good luck to him.

                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @nostrildamus ChatGPT throws up some interesting results...

                                          Who are the most criticised All Blacks on thesilverfern.com website?

                                          ChatGPT said:
                                          Here's a summary of some of the most heavily criticised All Blacks on the thesilverfern.com forums:

                                          🔹 1. Beauden Barrett
                                          Often lambasted for form issues and confidence:

                                          In a 2023 thread, one user declared:

                                          “Beauden Barrett should not be near an AB 10 Jersey. The older he gets, the worse he gets.”
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +15
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          +15
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          +15

                                          Another lamented his decline, noting he’s “never been the same since he moved to Japan and/or got married”
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          .

                                          🔹 2. Fihaki & Bell
                                          Specifically called out as dubious selections:

                                          In a 2025 selection thread, one poster argued:

                                          “Fihaki and Bell are shaping up as two of the most biased AB selections of all time… Bell is not even the best hooker at the Crusaders and Fihaki has the worst stats of any NZ winger… by some distance.”
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +15
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          +15
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          +15

                                          🔹 3. Blackadder (Akira Blackadder)
                                          Mentioned alongside Fihaki by users unhappy with his inclusion:

                                          Forum comment: “Havilli and Blackadder want you to hold their beers,” sarcastically comparing their picks
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          .

                                          🔹 4. Richie McCaw
                                          Though less frequent, he’s criticised for exploiting referee leniency on the breakdown:

                                          Wikipedia notes he was “labelled a ‘cheat’ by…” opponents and accused of “testing the referee early to know what you can get away with”
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +13
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +13
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +13
                                          .

                                          🔹 5. Coaches (Graham Henry, John Mitchell)
                                          Though not players, they are often scrutinised harshly—especially for coaching choices and team selection:

                                          Graham Henry faced heat for rotating players during the 2005 Grand Slam and controversial World Cup tactics
                                          reddit.com
                                          +2
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +2
                                          en.wikipedia.org
                                          +2
                                          .

                                          John Mitchell drew criticism for dropping Christian Cullen before the 2003 World Cup
                                          theniche-cache.com
                                          +1
                                          forum.thesilverfern.com
                                          +1
                                          .

                                          🧭 Summary of Most Criticised
                                          Name Reason for Criticism
                                          Beauden Barrett Declining form and increasingly error-prone performances
                                          Fihaki & Bell Questionable squad selections cited as biased and statistically weak
                                          Akira Blackadder Perceived as a poor selection relative to other options
                                          Richie McCaw Accused of violating breakdown laws and testing referees
                                          Graham Henry, John Mitchell Strategic decisions and non-transparent team management

                                          BonesB nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search