• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 2026

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
545 Posts 67 Posters 8.4k Views
All Blacks 2026
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by
    #506

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks 2026:

    And the 1995 team was unbeatable.

    France would say otherwise.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by
    #507

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    M A R Victor MeldrewV 4 Replies Last reply
    7
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by Dan54
    #508

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks 2026:

    @Dan54 So, what I’m interested from you, as someone who was paying attention at the time, is in other poor years, what were the performances like and what were the opposition like? Did the team give up during games? Could they not execute basic skills? Did they lose to teams they probably should have beaten? There’s a lot more to it than the number of wins and losses in a season.

    And the 1995 team was unbeatable. It took half the side vomiting on the sideline for South Africa to barely win.

    Usually generally the performance was average, like this year. Not sure in those days we thought not so much as giving up as not getting going. I will admit I was youngers and it never crossed my mind that teams would give up. The opposition especially during the 80s I thought was poor, as I have said at other times, I watched Wales train in Levin during WC, and the skill level etc was ordinary, and Quinell actuall told the front row boys from Levin, a couple if first graders and a second grade hooker from club team in the Horowhenua to lay off in the scrumming, as they were getting done. And Wales were in the semi-finals of that WC. There were some pretty ordinary teams getting whipped by AB team toward end of 80s . AN AB team with a few bloody good players, but nothing exceptional really.
    Did they lose to teams they should of beaten ? Hell yeah France in 93-4 we looked like we thought tackiling was optional at times are a couple that come to mind, and same against Wallabies early 80s, where it was a case of like Wellington this year, team turning off mentally (I thought). Mind you as I say, I tend to be (or used to especially) to believe we should aways win tests.
    It's hard to compare between era etc, because much as I was a fan boi even back in those days and look back fondly, I seriously doubt whether many of them would compete with modern teams, just because game has changed etc so much. I do say the way teams behaved and treated each other in those days would never be tolerated in todays games. At times there was a pretty proud bully system in team, and players etc that didn't didn't toe line in anything should be careful at training etc. Justin Marshall was almost strangled on a bus trip for being a smart arse and sitting in back seat etc etc. Rumour has it some of the, one in particular the 90s coulld or should be real embarrassed how he used to act with younger team memebrs. I not only read that in a players book, but heard it from someone who was acting as a temporary member for the party while overseas. There were times when the team culture left a lot to be desired , and that included the boozing etc, which you just can't do these days.

    We got by with at times bloody good teams, at others we struggled through with teams that average with a couple of real good players in them. Now we struggle because a few other teams, like SA (the most a team we beat once this year), France and Ireland all of which would have more players in a World XV than us, possibly England too.
    I wish like every supporter (of every sort) that my team played with 100% mentally and physically everytime they stepped on field, unfortunately the human and it doesn't happen that way.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    MacDazzler
    replied to pukunui last edited by
    #509

    @pukunui I forgot about how bad 2022 was until I saw your post.

    My goodness that was a bloody ordinary year for the All Blacks. 2009 from memory was also a bludger.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmeal
    replied to mohikamo last edited by
    #510

    @mohikamo Would you say the current team are the worst since the early 70s then or are they even worse now?

    I only asked AI do calculate the average losing margins.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote last edited by
    #511

    Perhaps ask A1 on winning number of games, which after all is the point of tests, if that's how you get your rugby knowledge mate.
    I know it's old fashioned , but genuinely watching rugby has always been the way I have only ever really judged teams. And not just losses, but wins too, I have seen wins (including this year) that have looked pretty average , and losses that have been pretty good.

    Though I can understand that's how many get a lot their rugby (or a lot of sport) info, just ask A1, or/and watch highlights (then look at shortened stats) perhaps takes less time etc.

    ShaquilleOatmealS KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to pukunui last edited by
    #512

    @pukunui said in All Blacks 2026:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    It was ordinary, saved by the Boks win in Joburg, but I think we showed signs that there was light at the end of the tunnel for 2023. There were a few hairy moments after thw Joburg test, but I felt at the time that it was to be expected with the coaching team changing mid season and we did also hammer Argentina and the Wallabies in the return fixtures that year. I felt like we were a more settled XV at the end of 2022 and the coaches knew what their best lineup was going into the 2023 RWC.

    Can't say I feel the same optimism going into 2026 and they still seem unsure on their best XV.

    gt12G pukunuiP 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmealS Offline
    ShaquilleOatmeal
    replied to Dan54 last edited by ShaquilleOatmeal
    #513

    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2026:

    Perhaps ask A1 on winning number of games, which after all is the point of tests, if that's how you get your rugby knowledge mate.
    I know it's old fashioned , but genuinely watching rugby has always been the way I have only ever really judged teams. And not just losses, but wins too, I have seen wins (including this year) that have looked pretty average , and losses that have been pretty good.

    Though I can understand that's how many get a lot their rugby (or a lot of sport) info, just ask A1, or/and watch highlights (then look at shortened stats) perhaps takes less time etc.

    I got AI to do a bit of maths because it was quicker than doing it myself. Nothing to do with my rugby knowledge. I’m just trying to find out how years I wasn’t around for were as bad or worse than in recent times. Doesn’t sound like they are unless you go by the simplistic wins/losses stat which can be found very easily. And as you point out, it’s the nature of the performances that matter. Those in 2025, with senior players flat out giving up, lack of basic skills, players avoiding their core duties, are the worst I’ve seen by a long way. I’m not hearing examples from the past that compare to what we saw last year.

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to African Monkey last edited by gt12
    #514

    @African-Monkey said in All Blacks 2026:

    @pukunui said in All Blacks 2026:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    It was ordinary, saved by the Boks win in Joburg, but I think we showed signs that there was light at the end of the tunnel for 2023. There were a few hairy moments after thw Joburg test, but I felt at the time that it was to be expected with the coaching team changing mid season and we did also hammer Argentina and the Wallabies in the return fixtures that year. I felt like we were a more settled XV at the end of 2022 and the coaches knew what their best lineup was going into the 2023 RWC.

    Can't say I feel the same optimism going into 2026 and they still seem unsure on their best XV.

    2022 certainly stands out, and is the right year to compare to for this last year. In 2022, the team was underperforming and the NZRU made changes to the coaching group that did dramatically improve the quality of play. The Twickenham result was a shocker in 2023, but we went a fluffybunny hair away from winning a WC - had we a proper kicking coach or had they let Dmac loose 5 minutes earlier, we win that game, even with the RC.

    So, that raises the question, does this caoching group need the same realignment. I think yes, but also that we need to completely shake up everything about coaching development, application, and selection. There is rot in the NZRU and the silly procedures they use to get the result that they want which needs to be starched out as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    restofit
    replied to pukunui last edited by restofit
    #515

    @pukunui said in All Blacks 2026:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    Disagree, 2022 schedule was harder.

    2022 we played No1 ranked peak Farrell-era Ireland 3 times for June series compared to playing France C x3 in 2025.

    Wallabies' overall player profile featured a lot more experience in 2022 (before Eddie blew everything up...) than 2024-25, they were slightly better than 2024-25 - remember Wobs beat South Africa 25-17 in Adelaide in 2022 RC.

    Under Foster in 2022, we beat South Africa 36-22 in one of the most comprehensive performances in years against a top 3 ranked nation.

    Also note that if France had brought their A team, we probably would've been looking at 4 or 5 losses in 2025 instead of 3...

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote last edited by
    #516

    Robertson will have an unwanted AB record forever, or god help the coach that takes it off him.

    The common theme of the bad loses in 2025 was leaking tries. Even in the 2022 home loss to Argentina the ABs only conceded one try while scoring two.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    replied to pukunui last edited by
    #517

    @pukunui

    2022 was a truly shitty year - particularly in the first half of the season - but post Ellis Park at least the trend was definitely upwards and the team was at least united..

    This year? Worse for me - no upward trend, reports of player/coach trust issues from multiple sources- and no one seems to know who the real head coach actually is.

    Let's hope the review sorts at least some of the mess out - otherwise things will get really messy i '26/7.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote last edited by booboo
    #518

    As examples of teams that were not as good as 2025:

    1991
    Lost in Sydney
    6-3 abomination win in Akl
    Awful scrape through wins v Italy, USA, Canada in RWC
    Loss in SF
    Awful, Awful year

    1994
    Loss to Frogs 2-0
    Draw with Bokke
    Gregan/Wilson

    1999
    Awful QF v Scotties
    Loss in SF
    Loss in 3v4

    I think the current is better than all of those.

    But I think we have the players to be better than we currently are.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mohikamo
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by
    #519

    @ShaquilleOatmeal

    I'd say the early 2020's are consistently worse than the early 1970's.

    There were not as many games played back in the 70's; so I can actually remember them all.
    In the amateur days form was much more up and down, than it is now.
    If you get on a run now (winning or losing) it seems to stick with a team more.

    There are a lot of corollaries between then and now; the 20's coming after the AB power decade of the 10's; and the 70's coming after the equally AB power decade of the 60's.

    1970
    Some people knock the 70 team a bit, mainly I think simply because they lost; but at the time this was considered the best AB team ever to tour SA. Nobody considered it a shit team, not like we think of the current one. In 70 we thought we were guna win; in 26 we think we are guna get smashed. Totally opposite mind set.

    1971
    You could definitely see we were on the slide.
    Lost the first test, which surprised everyone; but then came back in the 2nd test and absolutely smashed them.
    So everyone is thinking all good, back to normal; and then came the 3rd test.
    This was a bad loss (bit like SA at Wellington this year), and it became a bit of a life lesson for me. The ABs are not always going to be shit hot.
    Played good in the 4th test, but the Brits managed to scramble the draw which gave them the series.
    First AB series loss to the Lions, which shook the confidence a bit, especially after blitzing it all thru the 60s.

    1972
    3 zipped the Aussies. The Aussies were very very bad. We didn't have to do anything special to beat them.
    Then came 72-73 euro tour. A lot of people slag this team off too. But I thought they were ok. The Brits were actually quite good during the 70s, but we nearly did a grand slam, the Irish managing to snatch a draw right at the end of the final game, to stop us.
    People still rave about the next big game, v the Barbarians, but to me the ABs were not taking this game serious at all, and just went out and threw the ball around. It was a great game to watch, and the Baabaas snagged the win.
    The final game v France is a good example of what a say about the amateur era. This was right at the end of a very long tour, and I think the players just wanted to go home. We lost and I dont read anything particular into this game.

    1973
    73 was one fucked up year.
    Bok tour cancelled.
    One test match, beaten by the poms. The poms had been beaten by virtually all PUs in the lead up.
    The loss was stunning. Everyone thought this was guna be a walkover.
    I think I recall Bob Lendrum had a shocker. Which was a bit unfortunate, because I thought he was quite a good player, never played for NZ again.

    1974
    This was actually a good year.
    For everyone who thinks the ABs were shit in the early 70s, this year does not fit that narrative.
    Should have 3 zipped the Aussies in Aus, but one draw. The AB players apparently said some of the very very bad words to the Aussie ref (yes, home town refs in those days).
    Then came the euro tour.
    I was very apprehensive about this short tour. A bit like the coming tour to SA.
    The Brits had just completed an unbeaten tour of SA and they were so fucking full of it.
    Had Ireland Wales and the Baabaas (pretty much the 74 Lions team), in 8 days.
    It was like the Brits were guna do a tag team on us.
    But we very nearly did the trifecta.
    Joey Karam had a bit of a shocker in the last game. I think he'd taken a bit of battering in the first two games, and made the mistake which let the Barbarians (Lions I mean) in to snatch a draw.

    1975
    One test v Scotland in the water. Easy.

    1976
    Regulation win v Ireland.
    Then to SA. This was an ok team too I thought. Although not in the class of the 70 team.
    This series should have been in NZ, but wasn't for political reasons. If it had been I think we would have won 3-1 instead of losing 3-1.

    So all in all, the early 70s was a bit of a downer, compared to the 60s, but not consistently down. There was some up as well. At the start of every game I was confident we were guna win, and it was a bit of a shock when ever we didn't.
    Not like now. I thought our chances of beating the likes of England last year were very slim, and was not surprised at all when we didn't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote last edited by
    #520

    Forgot 1994 Gregan Wilson game. Added to above post.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to restofit last edited by
    #521

    @restofit said in All Blacks 2026:

    @pukunui said in All Blacks 2026:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    Disagree, 2022 schedule was harder.

    2022 we played No1 ranked peak Farrell-era Ireland 3 times for June series compared to playing France C x3 in 2025.

    Wallabies' overall player profile featured a lot more experience in 2022 (before Eddie blew everything up...) than 2024-25, they were slightly better than 2024-25 - remember Wobs beat South Africa 25-17 in Adelaide in 2022 RC.

    Under Foster in 2022, we beat South Africa 36-22 in one of the most comprehensive performances in years against a top 3 ranked nation.

    Also note that if France had brought their A team, we probably would've been looking at 4 or 5 losses in 2025 instead of 3...

    Im not convinced it was a significantly easier schedule . England are a better side now than 2022. Boks are arguably better now too with their expanded game. Sure, Ireland were probably better than the France team that toured here in 2025.

    Either way, a marginally harder list of fixtures is a pretty lame excuse for some all time record ending loses.
    Especially with a vastly more experienced team with guys like Whitelock, Cane, Retallick, Aaron Smith, Dane Coles. Plus Mounga, Akira Ioane, Papalii and Sotutu, who most people would regard as upgrades on todays squad.

    Will be interesting to see where it all goes from here. Those guys above were able to drag themselves to within a kick of the RWC trophy.

    Not sure this current team has it in them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pukunuiP Offline
    pukunuiP Offline
    pukunui
    replied to African Monkey last edited by
    #522

    @African-Monkey said in All Blacks 2026:

    @pukunui said in All Blacks 2026:

    @ShaquilleOatmeal
    It seems people have forgotten just how bad 2022 was.

    • First home/series loss to Ireland
    • First loss to Argentina (at home)
    • Well beaten by Boks in the first game
    • Saved by the ref calling time wasting against the Wallabies with time almost up.
    • Close calls against Japan and Scotland
    • Escaping with a draw v England

    All of this coming off the back of the 2021 eoyt where we got smacked by ireland and france and had to sack multiple assistant coaches.

    Also worth remembering this was all with multiple AB greats still in the team and a 10 who was a much better player than 2025 BB.

    2025 was shit, but I would argue 2022 was rock bottom.

    It was ordinary, saved by the Boks win in Joburg, but I think we showed signs that there was light at the end of the tunnel for 2023. There were a few hairy moments after thw Joburg test, but I felt at the time that it was to be expected with the coaching team changing mid season and we did also hammer Argentina and the Wallabies in the return fixtures that year. I felt like we were a more settled XV at the end of 2022 and the coaches knew what their best lineup was going into the 2023 RWC.

    Can't say I feel the same optimism going into 2026 and they still seem unsure on their best XV.

    Yeah that is the key. As a pure looks at results of a calendar year relative to the strength of them team I would say 2022 was worse than 2025. But there were still some pretty legendary players there to rework into a functional team.
    They almost made it even if there were some pretty shit performances and unwanted firsts in 2023 also. Eg. Getting belted by the Boks pre world cup and losing our first ever pool game.

    But if you look at it from a “state of the team” perspective we are probably in a worse place than 2022 given the leaders and game drivers of our team seem to be past it and/or just not good enough at leading/driving a game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to booboo last edited by
    #523

    @booboo said in All Blacks 2026:

    As examples of teams that were not as good as 2025:

    1991
    Lost in Sydney
    6-3 abomination win in Akl
    Awful scrape through wins v Italy, USA, Canada in RWC
    Loss in SF
    Awful, Awful year

    1994
    Loss to Frogs 2-0
    Draw with Bokke
    Gregan/Wilson

    1999
    Awful QF v Scotties
    Loss in SF
    Loss in 3v4

    I think the current is better than all of those.

    But I think we have the players to be better than we currently are.

    For me personally, I think only 1999 compares with this year due to the similar capitulation (aided by stupidity of selection) but the other two were just years when teams got the better of us.

    1991 we were the clear second best team in the world even if we muddled our way through. Despite the rankings I don't think we're the second best team this year.

    1994 we won a series over the Boks and lost to a classy France in the second test by the try from the end of the world. The Wallabies were still a class act in 1994, in hindsight that loss isn't as earth shattering as it felt that Wednesday night.

    Even when we were losing those matches, and I was less mature at dealing with losses then, I was never as dismayed as I was in the Boks and England losses this year.

    On 2022, I don't think anyone is trying to defend our performances that year so not sure if it's a great whataboutry.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to ShaquilleOatmeal last edited by Dan54
    #524

    @ShaquilleOatmeal said in All Blacks 2026:

    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2026:

    Perhaps ask A1 on winning number of games, which after all is the point of tests, if that's how you get your rugby knowledge mate.
    I know it's old fashioned , but genuinely watching rugby has always been the way I have only ever really judged teams. And not just losses, but wins too, I have seen wins (including this year) that have looked pretty average , and losses that have been pretty good.

    Though I can understand that's how many get a lot their rugby (or a lot of sport) info, just ask A1, or/and watch highlights (then look at shortened stats) perhaps takes less time etc.

    I got AI to do a bit of maths because it was quicker than doing it myself. Nothing to do with my rugby knowledge. I’m just trying to find out how years I wasn’t around for were as bad or worse than in recent times. Doesn’t sound like they are unless you go by the simplistic wins/losses stat which can be found very easily. And as you point out, it’s the nature of the performances that matter. Those in 2025, with senior players flat out giving up, lack of basic skills, players avoiding their core duties, are the worst I’ve seen by a long way. I’m not hearing examples from the past that compare to what we saw last year.

    Fair enough mate, but take my word for it, not suggesting you wrong to do it mate, just I perhaps don't understand A1 , and haven't seen where it help me find how teams perform. I thought As I said, in my opinion some of games I attended in 80s or 90s the players were pretty average, etc.
    I not sure how much you watched in 90s where the likes of Fitzy were getting roasted at first for not doing his proper core hooker roles because he was first hooker to really play game wide etc. I thought in 1998 we had a team, that were in the main fairly below average and didn't win one test, but still could see shoots of decent/good players. As I say Jonah was absolutely roasted by a lot for not have core skills of a winger etc, I couldn't beleive the number of people (members of my family too) who said he was hopeless.. The one thing I will bet, when we watch games , we often do it with a prejudice of how we think certain players should do, and perhaps close our minds to what's happening.
    But to me rugby isn't about maths etc, but I haven't seen all the walking around, players giving up (though Wellington was a switch off etc) and having a lack of core skills etc. Because if they are there are certainly a lot of piss poor teams in the world that the team have beaten. I don't see this huge lac of skills compared to other teams, or AB teams .
    Anyway, I won't change your mind, and you won't change mine. And even know there not a lot of rugby to watch . I will leave it at that. I will carry on enjoying watching and supporting the team etc, and you perhaps will continue to get frustrated with them.
    Lol mate it could be I taking easy way out, too old to worry about things I have seen before.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Dan54 last edited by
    #525

    @Dan54 Dude, can we please just clarify: You do know it's AI, I for Intelligence, not A1, huh? And typing 1 instead of I is just convenience? Right?

    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
    1

All Blacks 2026
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.