• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Comedy gold from the Walrus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
91 Posts 31 Posters 5.3k Views
Comedy gold from the Walrus
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #63

    @act-crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @nepia said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @act-crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    15 Stephen Larkham

    As someone with ACT in the name I'm unsure why you would include Larkham in this team? He was a fullback who converted to 10 not the other way around.

    As a schoolboy and in ACT club rugby he was a utility back and played in different positions. Got a shot on the wing for the Wallabies as well. He has played some 15,10 and even 12 at national level.

    Pffft, we're not talking about schoolboy and bum fuck Canberra club rugby here!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    Point is that whilst Macqueen gets plaudits for moving Larkham to 10, those that had seen him play earlier in his career knew that Bernie had an array of skills that would translate to running the cutter. It was hardly the shock that people make out.

    The concerns about his kicking game were pretty laughable given some of the other guys playing 10 in Australia at the time weren’t much better than Larkham.

    Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #65

    @act-crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    Point is that whilst Macqueen gets plaudits for moving Larkham to 10, those that had seen him play earlier in his career knew that Bernie had an array of skills that would translate to running the cutter. It was hardly the shock that people make out.

    The concerns about his kicking game were pretty laughable given some of the other guys playing 10 in Australia at the time weren’t much better than Larkham.

    I think Nepia's point is that while the other players in that team were decidedly ordinary when played out of position, Larkham was anything but.

    Edit: Kahui was actually a good winger, but the point is that Larkham broke through as a 15 and was first selected for the Wallabies in that position.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #66

    Can we not just solve the argument by putting Jeff Wilson at 15?

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Crucial on last edited by sparky
    #67

    @crucial For me, Jeff Wilson was at his best on the Right Wing supporting the break or the kick ahead.

    08:35 is IMHO the best try of all time. The South African defence does not much wrong, but Wilson scores untouched. Timing of the pass from Cullen and the execution of the kick from Wilson at pace are both perfect.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #68

    @sparky I agree. That's why I suggested that in @ACT-Crusader s 'Out of position' XV he be put in place of Larkham at 15.

    Those decisions in 99 really were crazy but in a way were ahead of their time. We don't blink an eye at interchangeable fullback/wings these days and select many players on their ability to perform in multiple roles.

    rotatedR BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Crucial on last edited by rotated
    #69

    @crucial said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    Those decisions in 99 really were crazy but in a way were ahead of their time. We don't blink an eye at interchangeable fullback/wings these days and select many players on their ability to perform in multiple roles.

    The Larkham move would have been a lot more interesting if Australia had not been ridiculously blessed with non-first-five goalkickers during his tenure. Burke, Mortlock, Roff, Eales all legitimately held their spot as starters and plenty of utility guys were coming off the bench (Rogers, Flatley, Giteau, Walker). In another era that flaw would have put them in a much more compromising position.

    It's hard to even imagine but - if say Carter was every bit the player he was but without the ability to goal kick how different selections and some players careers would have been during his tenure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #70

    @crucial said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @sparky I agree. That's why I suggested that in @ACT-Crusader s 'Out of position' XV he be put in place of Larkham at 15.

    Those decisions in 99 really were crazy but in a way were ahead of their time. We don't blink an eye at interchangeable fullback/wings these days and select many players on their ability to perform in multiple roles.

    Hmmm... Wright, Timu, Umaga were all happily lining up at the back or on the wing well before 99....

    jeggaJ Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #71

    @bones said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @crucial said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @sparky I agree. That's why I suggested that in @ACT-Crusader s 'Out of position' XV he be put in place of Larkham at 15.

    Those decisions in 99 really were crazy but in a way were ahead of their time. We don't blink an eye at interchangeable fullback/wings these days and select many players on their ability to perform in multiple roles.

    Hmmm... Wright, Timu, Umaga were all happily lining up at the back or on the wing well before 99....

    Jeff Wilson was the first one that sprung to mind when I read that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to Bones on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #72

    @bones said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @crucial said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @sparky I agree. That's why I suggested that in @ACT-Crusader s 'Out of position' XV he be put in place of Larkham at 15.

    Those decisions in 99 really were crazy but in a way were ahead of their time. We don't blink an eye at interchangeable fullback/wings these days and select many players on their ability to perform in multiple roles.

    Hmmm... Wright, Timu, Umaga were all happily lining up at the back or on the wing well before 99....

    Osborne as well. Campese is another one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Rancid Schnitzel on last edited by
    #73

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @act-crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    Point is that whilst Macqueen gets plaudits for moving Larkham to 10, those that had seen him play earlier in his career knew that Bernie had an array of skills that would translate to running the cutter. It was hardly the shock that people make out.

    The concerns about his kicking game were pretty laughable given some of the other guys playing 10 in Australia at the time weren’t much better than Larkham.

    I think Nepia's point is that while the other players in that team were decidedly ordinary when played out of position, Larkham was anything but.

    Edit: Kahui was actually a good winger, but the point is that Larkham broke through as a 15 and was first selected for the Wallabies in that position.

    Hey Rangi was an excellent 1st 5, he just got rubbish ball from the halfback...

    And FWIW, this wasn’t a ‘played out of position backline’, it was world class players that all played several positions.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #74

    @ACT-Crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @act-crusader said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    Point is that whilst Macqueen gets plaudits for moving Larkham to 10, those that had seen him play earlier in his career knew that Bernie had an array of skills that would translate to running the cutter. It was hardly the shock that people make out.

    The concerns about his kicking game were pretty laughable given some of the other guys playing 10 in Australia at the time weren’t much better than Larkham.

    I think Nepia's point is that while the other players in that team were decidedly ordinary when played out of position, Larkham was anything but.

    Edit: Kahui was actually a good winger, but the point is that Larkham broke through as a 15 and was first selected for the Wallabies in that position.

    Hey Rangi was an excellent 1st 5, he just got rubbish ball from the halfback...

    And FWIW, this wasn’t a ‘played out of position backline’, it was world class players that all played several positions.

    In that case I withdraw my comment - as it looked like a 'played out of position and didn't play that well in that position' team. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    Planet Rugby's TOTY:

    https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/109572592/four-all-blacks-in-planet-rugbys-team-of-the-year

    Ardie
    Bender
    Rieko
    BBBR

    Although Stuff gets Julian and Rieko muxed ip ...

    The Planet Rugby judges invoked a selectorial prerogative in naming two specialist left wings, Savea and Ireland's All Blacks slayer Jacob Stockdale.
    

    15-Israel Folau (Australia),
    14-Ioane,
    13-Jonathan Davies (Wales)
    12-Farrell
    11-Stockdale
    10-Sexton
    9-De Klerk
    8-Pocock
    7-Savea
    6-O'Mahony
    5-Ryan
    4-Retallick
    3-Furlong
    2-Marx
    1-Steven Kitshoff (South Africa)

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #76

    So at 15 and 8 you have 2 of the most one dimensional and over rated players on the planet...these things always throw some loopy balls.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #77

    Bonocock was ineffective as no 8 that’s a baffling pick .

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to booboo on last edited by Machpants
    #78

    @booboo That list you posted was the public voted one, PR list is:

    15-Ben Smith (New Zealand),
    14-Rieko Ioane (New Zealand),
    13-Semi Radrada (Fiji),
    12-Owen Farrell (England),
    11-Jacob Stockdale (Ireland),
    10-Jonathan Sexton (Ireland),
    9-Faf de Klerk,
    8-David Pocock (Australia), 7
    -Ardie Savea (New Zealand),
    6-Peter O'Mahony (Ireland),
    5-James Ryan (Ireland),
    4-Brodie Retallick (New Zealand),
    3-Tadhg Furlong (Ireland),
    2-Malcolm Marx (South Africa),
    1-Cian Healy (Ireland).

    I agree that Pocockwomble it utterly ineffective at anything apart from break down turnovers, so really it's just those easy to notice moments that's getting him in the team. Ridiculous lack of actual analysis to put him in there, 90% Read is better but I'd go for a fit Vunipola to bend the line and a nice contrast with Ardie's style. Also Marx? No way, he's not consistent enough. Once again it's his glory open field moments thatt put him there - his line out throwing can be very poor. I'd go for Taylor or Rory Best just cos he's such a warrior.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #79

    @Machpants said in Comedy gold from the Walrus:

    @booboo That list you posted was the public voted one, PR list is:

    15-Ben Smith (New Zealand),
    14-Rieko Ioane (New Zealand),
    13-Semi Radrada (Fiji),
    12-Owen Farrell (England),
    11-Jacob Stockdale (Ireland),
    10-Jonathan Sexton (Ireland),
    9-Faf de Klerk,
    8-David Pocock (Australia), 7
    -Ardie Savea (New Zealand),
    6-Peter O'Mahony (Ireland),
    5-James Ryan (Ireland),
    4-Brodie Retallick (New Zealand),
    3-Tadhg Furlong (Ireland),
    2-Malcolm Marx (South Africa),
    1-Cian Healy (Ireland).

    I agree that Pocockwomble it utterly ineffective at anything apart from break down turnovers, so really it's just those easy to notice moments that's getting him in the team. Ridiculous lack of actual analysis to put him in there, 90% Read is better but I'd go for a fit Vunipola to bend the line and a nice contrast with Ardie's style. Also Marx? No way, he's not consistent enough. Once again it's his glory open field moments thatt put him there - his line out throwing can be very poor. I'd go for Taylor or Rory Best just cos he's such a warrior.

    Oops should have noticed Folau at 15 when they'd named Smith ... d'oh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #80

    Once again proving the general public are mentally deficient

    Although how the PR "experts" can pick Pocock at 8 is ridiculous. He works his ring piece off, but as an 8 he's quite shit. Imagine if they played him in the only position he is any good at?

    antipodeanA ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    Fucking hell Chris Latham at 15? If you're going with an Aussie fullback, there was a guy called Matt Burke who was pretty fucking handy for the Wallabies, as I recall.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #82

    @MN5 Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4

Comedy gold from the Walrus
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.