Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

It's the language police again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Help
60 Posts 13 Posters 1.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PaekakboyzP Paekakboyz

    @jegga dude. Cam girl is surely a term familiar to the Jegga!!?

    Trust me, the thot streamers on Twitch aren't that flash, and there are far better sites to visit.

    See, Mokey isn't the only one that does research for the greater good 🙂 :face_blowing_a_kiss: you are welcome!

    jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @Paekakboyz said in It's the language police again:

    @jegga dude. Cam girl is surely a term familiar to the Jegga!!?

    Trust me, the thot streamers on Twitch aren't that flash, and there are far better sites to visit.

    See, Mokey isn't the only one that does research for the greater good 🙂 :face_blowing_a_kiss: you are welcome!

    I’m questioning you wanting to ban thots , a girls got to make a living .

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jeggaJ jegga

      @Paekakboyz said in It's the language police again:

      @jegga dude. Cam girl is surely a term familiar to the Jegga!!?

      Trust me, the thot streamers on Twitch aren't that flash, and there are far better sites to visit.

      See, Mokey isn't the only one that does research for the greater good 🙂 :face_blowing_a_kiss: you are welcome!

      I’m questioning you wanting to ban thots , a girls got to make a living .

      PaekakboyzP Offline
      PaekakboyzP Offline
      Paekakboyz
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      @jegga if they stuck to insta it'd be all good. The annoyance is more about them never getting strikes for nudity when they (admins/twitch) go super hard on anyone else. The common thinking is that those streamers give the admins free access to their patreon lol... where the actual good stuff is posted.

      jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • PaekakboyzP Paekakboyz

        @jegga if they stuck to insta it'd be all good. The annoyance is more about them never getting strikes for nudity when they (admins/twitch) go super hard on anyone else. The common thinking is that those streamers give the admins free access to their patreon lol... where the actual good stuff is posted.

        jeggaJ Offline
        jeggaJ Offline
        jegga
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        @Paekakboyz said in It's the language police again:

        @jegga if they stuck to insta it'd be all good. The annoyance is more about them never getting strikes for nudity when they (admins/twitch) go super hard on anyone else. The common thinking is that those streamers give the admins free access to their patreon lol... where the actual good stuff is posted.

        Instagram is pretty strict about censoring stuff now . Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

        SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jeggaJ jegga

          @Paekakboyz said in It's the language police again:

          @jegga if they stuck to insta it'd be all good. The annoyance is more about them never getting strikes for nudity when they (admins/twitch) go super hard on anyone else. The common thinking is that those streamers give the admins free access to their patreon lol... where the actual good stuff is posted.

          Instagram is pretty strict about censoring stuff now . Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

          SnowyS Offline
          SnowyS Offline
          Snowy
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          @jegga said in It's the language police again:

          Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

          I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.

          NepiaN boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
          5
          • DuluthD Offline
            DuluthD Offline
            Duluth
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Meanwhile we failed our review

            Sport and Off Topic are clean now. Politics is still too smutty

            So I've killed a few more posts.. we'll see what they say now

            SnowyS mariner4lifeM taniwharugbyT 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • SnowyS Snowy

              @jegga said in It's the language police again:

              Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

              I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.

              NepiaN Offline
              NepiaN Offline
              Nepia
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

              @jegga said in It's the language police again:

              Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

              I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.

              I can kind if understand it all. I don't know what ethots is but assume it's women who like taking their clothes off on the internet.

              jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • DuluthD Duluth

                Meanwhile we failed our review

                Sport and Off Topic are clean now. Politics is still too smutty

                So I've killed a few more posts.. we'll see what they say now

                SnowyS Offline
                SnowyS Offline
                Snowy
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                Politics is still too smutty

                Politics is smutty full stop.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • DuluthD Duluth

                  Meanwhile we failed our review

                  Sport and Off Topic are clean now. Politics is still too smutty

                  So I've killed a few more posts.. we'll see what they say now

                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4life
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                  Sport and Off Topic are clean now. Politics is still too smutty

                  t'was ever thus

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • NepiaN Nepia

                    @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                    @jegga said in It's the language police again:

                    Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

                    I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.

                    I can kind if understand it all. I don't know what ethots is but assume it's women who like taking their clothes off on the internet.

                    jeggaJ Offline
                    jeggaJ Offline
                    jegga
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    @Nepia said in It's the language police again:

                    @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                    @jegga said in It's the language police again:

                    Last year there were a lot of ethots getting doxxed and having the irs set on them because they weren’t declaring the money they were earning on Patreon etc .

                    I am so pleased with myself for understanding that.

                    I can kind if understand it all. I don't know what ethots is but assume it's women who like taking their clothes off on the internet.

                    Ok boomer

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • DuluthD Duluth

                      Meanwhile we failed our review

                      Sport and Off Topic are clean now. Politics is still too smutty

                      So I've killed a few more posts.. we'll see what they say now

                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      @Duluth are they running words together including spaces? say if you have the word supeR, which ends in an R is immediately prior to ape, is it running the together to get the trigger word?

                      @dogmeat post above refers to another word for curtains, which has a 'd' in the front but would be a trigger word, is that sort of thing triggering it too?

                      DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        @Duluth are they running words together including spaces? say if you have the word supeR, which ends in an R is immediately prior to ape, is it running the together to get the trigger word?

                        @dogmeat post above refers to another word for curtains, which has a 'd' in the front but would be a trigger word, is that sort of thing triggering it too?

                        DuluthD Offline
                        DuluthD Offline
                        Duluth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        @taniwharugby I'm sure it's smarter than that. It'll read sentences etc

                        SnowyS taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • DuluthD Duluth

                          @taniwharugby I'm sure it's smarter than that. It'll read sentences etc

                          SnowyS Offline
                          SnowyS Offline
                          Snowy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                          It'll read sentences etc

                          So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.

                          How Orwellian of you ggl.

                          DuluthD mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • SnowyS Snowy

                            @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                            It'll read sentences etc

                            So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.

                            How Orwellian of you ggl.

                            DuluthD Offline
                            DuluthD Offline
                            Duluth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                            So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                            There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                            https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/9335567#sexual_content

                            SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • SnowyS Snowy

                              @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                              It'll read sentences etc

                              So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.

                              How Orwellian of you ggl.

                              mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4life
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                              @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                              It'll read sentences etc

                              So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt. The internet is doomed by a company that helped create it and nobody will ever go beyond txt spk spllg.

                              How Orwellian of you ggl.

                              ggl can lck the salt from the bttm of my sweaty trpcl blls

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • DuluthD Duluth

                                @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/9335567#sexual_content

                                SnowyS Offline
                                SnowyS Offline
                                Snowy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                Those guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.

                                (Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
                                I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.

                                Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.

                                Is that actually their problem?

                                mariner4lifeM DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                • SnowyS Snowy

                                  @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                  @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                  So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                  There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                  I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                  contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                  Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                  Those guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.

                                  (Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
                                  I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.

                                  Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.

                                  Is that actually their problem?

                                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                                  mariner4life
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                  @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                  @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                  So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                  There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                  I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                  contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                  Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                  Those guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.

                                  (Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
                                  I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.

                                  Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.

                                  Is that actually their problem?

                                  wait until the Warriors kick off. And it becomes apparent certain Super teams are not at the expected levels

                                  But that will be nothing, nothing i tell you, compared to if we get to June and the ABs are utterly hopeless under Foster. We'll be blacklisted forever.

                                  SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                    @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                    @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                    @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                    So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                    There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                    I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                    contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                    Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                    Those guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.

                                    (Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
                                    I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.

                                    Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.

                                    Is that actually their problem?

                                    wait until the Warriors kick off. And it becomes apparent certain Super teams are not at the expected levels

                                    But that will be nothing, nothing i tell you, compared to if we get to June and the ABs are utterly hopeless under Foster. We'll be blacklisted forever.

                                    SnowyS Offline
                                    SnowyS Offline
                                    Snowy
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @mariner4life The dark web awaits.

                                    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • SnowyS Snowy

                                      @mariner4life The dark web awaits.

                                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                                      mariner4life
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                      @mariner4life The dark web awaits.

                                      sweet, i'll be able to buy some sinister shit without having to change browsers

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • SnowyS Snowy

                                        @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                        @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                        So we basically can't discuss anything that might be construed as containing sxual cntnt.

                                        There are plenty of conversations that fit within the guidelines. I don't think we fail on anything under the sexual list here.

                                        I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                        contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                        Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                        Those guys don't support the Black Claps. Difficult to support them without expletives.

                                        (Ah I said clap - that's a slang word for a disease).
                                        I really don't know what will be acceptable and you might as well shut it all down.

                                        Our attempts to express ourselves with poor spelling won't work. Fork.

                                        Is that actually their problem?

                                        DuluthD Offline
                                        DuluthD Offline
                                        Duluth
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                        I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                        contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                        Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                        Nope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.

                                        It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)

                                        mariner4lifeM jeggaJ SnowyS 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • DuluthD Duluth

                                          @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                          I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                          contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                          Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                          Nope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.

                                          It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)

                                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4lifeM Offline
                                          mariner4life
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @Duluth said in It's the language police again:

                                          @Snowy said in It's the language police again:

                                          I just looked through that and I really don't see how the Fern could be culpable of any of it except:

                                          contains a significant amount of or prominently features obscene or profane language.
                                          Examples: Swear or curse words, variations and misspellings of profane language

                                          Nope. That's under 'Shocking Content'.

                                          It's the 'Sexual content' list that we've gotten in trouble for (it this rule everytime)

                                          we, posters of the fern, are nothing if not sexual beings

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search