Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallaby EOYT 2016

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
368 Posts 49 Posters 94.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CatograndeC Catogrande

    Bloody hell, that match had me chewing my fingernails most of the way through. The only time I felt sure about the winner was during the first 20 minutes. Were Aussie that good or were we that bad? Dunno, perhaps a bit of both.

    Peyper's performance wasn't that great but also it wasn't as poor as some would suggest. He missed a few knock ons but not too many glaring errors that influenced things. Yellow card was a joke though.

    W Offline
    W Offline
    Wreck Diver
    wrote on last edited by Wreck Diver
    #270

    @Catogrande said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

    Bloody hell, that match had me chewing my fingernails most of the way through. The only time I felt sure about the winner was during the first 20 minutes. Were Aussie that good or were we that bad? Dunno, perhaps a bit of both.

    Peyper's performance wasn't that great but also it wasn't as poor as some would suggest. He missed a few knock ons but not too many glaring errors that influenced things. Yellow card was a joke though.

    I'm surprised that Peyer and the TMO missed all of England neck roll offenses in the first half. England made their own luck which is a mark of a good side.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Billy TellB Billy Tell

      Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

      The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      profitius
      wrote on last edited by
      #271

      @Billy-Tell said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

      Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

      The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

      The SH teams don't look as 'fresh' as in previous years. Moore was asked by the interviewer were they tired and he said "no". He was just trying not to make excuses but the reality is they did look tired.

      W Billy TellB 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P profitius

        @Billy-Tell said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

        Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

        The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

        The SH teams don't look as 'fresh' as in previous years. Moore was asked by the interviewer were they tired and he said "no". He was just trying not to make excuses but the reality is they did look tired.

        W Offline
        W Offline
        Wreck Diver
        wrote on last edited by
        #272

        @profitius said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

        @Billy-Tell said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

        Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

        The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

        The SH teams don't look as 'fresh' as in previous years. Moore was asked by the interviewer were they tired and he said "no". He was just trying not to make excuses but the reality is they did look tired.

        But its the excuse we hear year in year out during the June tours. Its the first think we hear and its already an excuse being used by the Lions. Change the record its got a big scratch and the needle is stuck

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P profitius

          @Billy-Tell said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

          Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

          The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

          The SH teams don't look as 'fresh' as in previous years. Moore was asked by the interviewer were they tired and he said "no". He was just trying not to make excuses but the reality is they did look tired.

          Billy TellB Offline
          Billy TellB Offline
          Billy Tell
          wrote on last edited by
          #273

          @profitius said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

          @Billy-Tell said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

          Well well. 6N should come down to Ire vs Eng in Dublin, but I rate France a chance to throw a spanner in the works, although Ireland have France at home.

          The NH somewhat owned the AIs in the end, not a single signature SH display, bar Australia creaming a truly woeful Wales.

          The SH teams don't look as 'fresh' as in previous years. Moore was asked by the interviewer were they tired and he said "no". He was just trying not to make excuses but the reality is they did look tired.

          The teams are tired. I don't like it being used as a excuse. And luckily it isn't.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jeggaJ Offline
            jeggaJ Offline
            jegga
            wrote on last edited by
            #274

            Hell of a year to be a pommy rugby supporter, didn't see the game but if reports are anything to go by if England had their shit together in the first 20 it could have been an absolute shocker for Australia.
            Krusty has coached his team to 6 wins from 15 games this year, there must be rumours in aussie about him getting the axe soon?

            NTAN BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • kiwiinmelbK Offline
              kiwiinmelbK Offline
              kiwiinmelb
              wrote on last edited by
              #275

              It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

              W taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • jeggaJ Offline
                jeggaJ Offline
                jegga
                wrote on last edited by
                #276

                Hahahahahahahahahahaha

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

                  It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  Wreck Diver
                  wrote on last edited by Wreck Diver
                  #277

                  @kiwiinmelb said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                  It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

                  It really doesn't matter if they do get more than 18 wins it doesn't prove anything as it doesn't prove a lot with us. If they do well done to them. But I couldn't give a Fcuk but the media will think its like Zeus has returned and is playing for England.

                  jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • W Wreck Diver

                    @kiwiinmelb said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                    It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

                    It really doesn't matter if they do get more than 18 wins it doesn't prove anything as it doesn't prove a lot with us. If they do well done to them. But I couldn't give a Fcuk but the media will think its like Zeus has returned and is playing for England.

                    jeggaJ Offline
                    jeggaJ Offline
                    jegga
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #278

                    @Wreck-Diver said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                    @kiwiinmelb said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                    It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

                    It really doesn't matter if they do get more than 18 wins it doesn't prove anything as it doesn't prove a lot with us. If they do well done to them. But I couldn't give a Fcuk but the media will think its like Zeus has returned and is playing for England.

                    How does it not prove a lot with us?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BonesB Online
                      BonesB Online
                      Bones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #279

                      Yeah sure Peyper wasn't that bad... straight after he carded DHP for SFA, he stood there and watched Hughes shove his hand in the face of a wallaby and mash his face into the ground. Very fair handed.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jeggaJ jegga

                        Hell of a year to be a pommy rugby supporter, didn't see the game but if reports are anything to go by if England had their shit together in the first 20 it could have been an absolute shocker for Australia.
                        Krusty has coached his team to 6 wins from 15 games this year, there must be rumours in aussie about him getting the axe soon?

                        NTAN Offline
                        NTAN Offline
                        NTA
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #280

                        @jegga said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                        Krusty has coached his team to 6 wins from 15 games this year, there must be rumours in aussie about him getting the axe soon?

                        Who else is there?

                        Anyway, i hope nobody in the Wallabies camp blames the ref. I'm going back to sleep. Cricket season!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • jeggaJ jegga

                          Hell of a year to be a pommy rugby supporter, didn't see the game but if reports are anything to go by if England had their shit together in the first 20 it could have been an absolute shocker for Australia.
                          Krusty has coached his team to 6 wins from 15 games this year, there must be rumours in aussie about him getting the axe soon?

                          BovidaeB Offline
                          BovidaeB Offline
                          Bovidae
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #281

                          @jegga And SA had 8 loses - a poor year for both teams.

                          I haven't seen the game yet but have recorded it. This Grand Slam tour was always going to be demanding, and in hindsight Aust would have been wiser to play Ireland and England at the start. They probably had little choice though.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • NTAN Offline
                            NTAN Offline
                            NTA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #282

                            Reading commentary: execution killed us. Held up twice over the line. A little knock on from Pocock prevented another try. Another pass created an intercept. Some shit work from Phipps and others trying to inject some pace.

                            The coach has to wear some of that, and also the fact that the bench didn't see a lot of time this tour.

                            But the players simply have to do better. The effect of Byrnes has not quite filtered through, clearly.

                            The depth is probably better right now, but not across all positions.

                            Really need 2017 to be that turning point to build a couple of good years. Right now, I could give less fucks about rugby.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • CrucialC Offline
                              CrucialC Offline
                              Crucial
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #283

                              Bit of a misread on the events there Nick. The tries held up were more to do with good defence than poor execution. Pococks knock on created an opportunity rather than lose one.
                              The real killer for you guys was Phipps having a complete brain fart waiting for a call from Peyper that never came. At that point in the game your lot were playing better and England were starting to look like they might get frustrated and crumble. It let them back in, they gathered their heads and built from there.
                              However you were hard done by with Yardes try. The TMO telling Peyper he never lost contact with the ball while the evidence was the opposite.

                              NTAN antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • CrucialC Crucial

                                Bit of a misread on the events there Nick. The tries held up were more to do with good defence than poor execution. Pococks knock on created an opportunity rather than lose one.
                                The real killer for you guys was Phipps having a complete brain fart waiting for a call from Peyper that never came. At that point in the game your lot were playing better and England were starting to look like they might get frustrated and crumble. It let them back in, they gathered their heads and built from there.
                                However you were hard done by with Yardes try. The TMO telling Peyper he never lost contact with the ball while the evidence was the opposite.

                                NTAN Offline
                                NTAN Offline
                                NTA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #284

                                @Crucial said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                                Bit of a misread on the events there Nick. The tries held up were more to do with good defence than poor execution. Pococks knock on created an opportunity rather than lose one.

                                Getting held up is good defensive execution, but getting close enough to be over the line and not being able to score indicates another option was available, or that the subsequent scrum play wasn't good enough.

                                The point I guess I was trying to make is we got close, but couldn't finish.

                                Its another game I won't see due to the shitty timeslot

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  SimonAdd_2
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #285

                                  Good match. Australia came out like a house on fire, similar to the first Test in June, and England looked to be hanging on by their fingernails. Australia couldn't keep up the intensity though, and also like in that first Test England's forwards managed to get on top and built the pressure.

                                  Some very strange refereeing calls both ways - I thought Yarde's try was a knock-on and DHP should never have been sin-binned, but also Pocock clearly dived on Farrell when he had dropped to collect a loose ball in the lead-up to the first Australian try.

                                  I thought Nathan Hughes was excellent for England - he had big shoes to fill and while he doesn't have quite Billy V's relentless go forward, he kept carrying well after Timani had vanished from sight, and his extra acceleration and threat of the offload adds a different dimension.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • barbarianB Offline
                                    barbarianB Offline
                                    barbarian
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #286

                                    Pretty disappointing way to end the season.

                                    We started strongly, but needed to make it count more than we did. Should have been 20-blot, but we couldn't convert our chances and let England back in.

                                    In the end, England were just too good. Hung tough in the first stanza, then kicked away. Their forwards were too physical, their backs too composed. They waited for our errors and then feasted on them.

                                    Peyper was poor, but it didn't effect the end result. I thought he was only watching one team at the breakdown, and the Poms got all the 50/50s - the call before Youngs try was a case in point. But that's rugby, and we had plenty of chances to take him out of the game but didn't take them.

                                    What to make of that season? Fuck I don't know. We played 7 games against the best two sides in the World, and were well dusted in all fucking 7. Still can't quite believe that, after the form we showed at the RWC.

                                    Rugby's a funny game sometimes, hey.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • NTAN NTA

                                      Reading commentary: execution killed us. Held up twice over the line. A little knock on from Pocock prevented another try. Another pass created an intercept. Some shit work from Phipps and others trying to inject some pace.

                                      The coach has to wear some of that, and also the fact that the bench didn't see a lot of time this tour.

                                      But the players simply have to do better. The effect of Byrnes has not quite filtered through, clearly.

                                      The depth is probably better right now, but not across all positions.

                                      Really need 2017 to be that turning point to build a couple of good years. Right now, I could give less fucks about rugby.

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      akan004
                                      wrote on last edited by akan004
                                      #287

                                      @NTA Timani was huge in the first half, NTA. Quieter in the second as England had all the ball. But it makes you wonder how Cheika selected Mumm last week when you have this great ball runner to pick from. The lineout appeared to be fine as well with him there. He should at the very least be selected on the bench to bring on some impact later in the game. Cheika's selections at times this year have been questionable.

                                      NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • kiwiinmelbK kiwiinmelb

                                        It has to be said, our record of 18 wins is under genuine threat now, will seem a bit hollow though if they get there without playing the ABs you would think ...... no fault of theirs though.

                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugby
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #288

                                        @kiwiinmelb records are made to be broken.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A akan004

                                          @NTA Timani was huge in the first half, NTA. Quieter in the second as England had all the ball. But it makes you wonder how Cheika selected Mumm last week when you have this great ball runner to pick from. The lineout appeared to be fine as well with him there. He should at the very least be selected on the bench to bring on some impact later in the game. Cheika's selections at times this year have been questionable.

                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #289

                                          @akan004 said in Wallaby EOYT 2016:

                                          @NTA Timani was huge in the first half, NTA. Quieter in the second as England had all the ball. But it makes you wonder how Cheika selected Mumm last week when you have this great ball runner to pick from. The lineout appeared to be fine as well with him there. He should at the very least be selected on the bench to bring on some impact later in the game. Cheika's selection at times this year have been questionable.

                                          Yeah I think we need to see a proper #8, even if you're going to have the Pooper on the flanks. That won't be a concern next year with Pocock on sabbatical. Hopefully Timani continues at 8, and guys like Holloway and McCalman get a good season in.

                                          Most of the games I watched, we needed to get more out of the tight five. Wales was an exception, but then Wales were shit and we cantered that one home.

                                          Some of the selections have looked like horses for courses, and then shit in hindsight. We lost to Ireland by 3, despite the lopsided penalty count and Mumm's brainfart. But if we'd won, does Mumm's good work to make up for that error get tossed away?

                                          The real question you have to ask: in two games against the ABs, the Irish gave away 8 penalties. So why pick a Wallaby lineup with two opensides, that is likely to get penalised at the breakdown? Didn't help that Ireland had stacks of possession, which was a factor in how many you give away.

                                          Dunno. People have perception of players and tend to stick with them. Some people look at Genia's work this year in contrast to Phipps, and forget every fucking awful box kick he put up. Swings and roundabouts.

                                          The thing is, we need to stop losing on the swings. If that makes any sense.

                                          Ultimately, losses like Ireland, and this one, are better for the team over the longer term. The cracks can't be papered over - our discipline and execution just aren't good enough.

                                          And that needs to change at the provincial level and schools level. Skills just aren't valued when incumbency is pretty much assured. The kids who are in the school first XV have few rivals to put pressure on them. The base isn't broad enough.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search