Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Other Cricket

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.9k Posts 82 Posters 128.3k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

    VirgilV Do not disturb
    VirgilV Do not disturb
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #1696

    @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

    @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

    @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

    Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

    How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

    It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

    We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
    The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

    *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

    SmudgeS boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • VirgilV Virgil

      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

      We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
      The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

      *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

      SmudgeS Offline
      SmudgeS Offline
      Smudge
      wrote on last edited by
      #1697

      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

      We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
      The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

      *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

      Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

      Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

      https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

      VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • SmudgeS Smudge

        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

        @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

        @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

        How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

        It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

        We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
        The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

        *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

        Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

        Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

        https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

        VirgilV Do not disturb
        VirgilV Do not disturb
        Virgil
        wrote on last edited by
        #1698

        @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

        @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

        @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

        @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

        Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

        How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

        It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

        We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
        The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

        *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

        Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

        Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

        https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

        So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

        SmudgeS 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

          @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

          It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

          Chris B.C Offline
          Chris B.C Offline
          Chris B.
          wrote on last edited by
          #1699

          @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

          @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

          @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

          Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

          How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

          It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

          To paraphrase Warnie - "Can't bat, can't field!"

          I found him pretty annoying vs India and more annoying now!

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • VirgilV Virgil

            @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

            @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

            @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

            @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

            @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

            Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

            How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

            It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

            We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
            The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

            *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

            Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

            Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

            https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

            So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

            SmudgeS Offline
            SmudgeS Offline
            Smudge
            wrote on last edited by
            #1700

            @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

            @Smudge said in Other Cricket:

            @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

            @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

            @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

            @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

            Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

            How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

            It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

            We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
            The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

            *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

            Lowest amount of runs off the bat in an innings was in 1924.

            Of South Africa's 30 runs, 19 of them came from the blade.

            https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/south-africa-tour-of-england-1924-61820/england-vs-south-africa-1st-test-62539/full-scorecard

            So in effect we have the 3rd lowest all time score...

            You have my support on that.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

              @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

              It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

              bayimportsB Offline
              bayimportsB Offline
              bayimports
              wrote on last edited by
              #1701

              @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

              @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

              @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

              Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

              How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

              It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

              it seems some media feel our pain

              https://www.thepost.co.nz/sport/360757966/misfield-australian-rookie-means-nz-keep-lowest-test-score-record

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CyclopsC Offline
                CyclopsC Offline
                Cyclops
                wrote on last edited by
                #1702

                I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • SmudgeS Offline
                  SmudgeS Offline
                  Smudge
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1703

                  90 secs or so on that 1955 test can be found here from 14m 52s in:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • CyclopsC Cyclops

                    I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                    The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                    VirgilV Do not disturb
                    VirgilV Do not disturb
                    Virgil
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1704

                    @Cyclops said in Other Cricket:

                    I'm still more annoyed about the South Africans letting the Aussies off the hook, from 21/9 to 50 odd all out.

                    The crazy thing about our 26 is that we dragged it out for 27 overs. Almost a whole session!

                    Not to mention we had the Poms 8/23 in that Auckland test a few years ago. They managed to get to 58 thanks to a lower order bowler

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • VirgilV Virgil

                      @KiwiPie said in Other Cricket:

                      @bayimports said in Other Cricket:

                      @Daffy-Jaffy said in Other Cricket:

                      Windies all out for 27. Starc 6 for 9, Boland 3 for 2.

                      How can anyone be happy about this? So close and yet we still own that record, feels like Starc let them get a couple of extra runs to ensure the wound never heals lol

                      It was all bloody Konstas - 2 dropped catches and let one through his legs for the single to get to 27.

                      We can claim a moral victory* of sorts, all the runs made in our 26 were off the bat.
                      The Windies had 6 extras in their 27 soooooo you could argue their batsmen made the lowest combined runs from the bat only.

                      *Ironically it was on the same date 6 years to the day we lost the CWC final to England, moral victories we seem to be good at.

                      boobooB Offline
                      boobooB Offline
                      booboo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1705

                      @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                      lost

                      Lost?

                      VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MN5M Offline
                        MN5M Offline
                        MN5
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1706

                        The way Zimbabwe play I wouldn’t bet against them having a crack at that 26

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • boobooB booboo

                          @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                          lost

                          Lost?

                          VirgilV Do not disturb
                          VirgilV Do not disturb
                          Virgil
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1707

                          @booboo said in Other Cricket:

                          @Virgil said in Other Cricket:

                          lost

                          Lost?

                          Robbed
                          Cheated
                          Didnt win but didnt lose

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sparkyS Offline
                            sparkyS Offline
                            sparky
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1708

                            Gilbert Enoka has been hired by the England Cricket team until next year's Ashes tour of Australia.

                            https://www.skysports.com/amp/cricket/news/12173/13400086/england-vs-india-ben-stokes-ready-for-fourth-test-battle-as-he-hails-impact-of-new-ex-new-zealand-rugby-coach

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 1kiwi1 Offline
                              1kiwi1 Offline
                              1kiwi
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1709

                              Joe Root has overtaken Jacques Kallis (13289) so is now the third highest run scorer in test cricket history.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • sparkyS Offline
                                sparkyS Offline
                                sparky
                                wrote on last edited by sparky
                                #1710

                                And Joseph Root needs 38 more runs to overtaking Ricky Ponting as the second highest scorer in test cricket.

                                He is on 82 not out. Scores level at Old Trafford on the third day and England have six first innings wickets remaining.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • sparkyS Offline
                                  sparkyS Offline
                                  sparky
                                  wrote on last edited by sparky
                                  #1711

                                  Root has his hundred. His 38th in Test Cricket.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • sparkyS Offline
                                    sparkyS Offline
                                    sparky
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1712

                                    And Joe Root's done it. He's now the second highest run scorer in Test history with only the great Sachin Tendulkar ahead of him. England 433-4 with a lead of 75 at Tea.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • sparkyS Offline
                                      sparkyS Offline
                                      sparky
                                      wrote on last edited by sparky
                                      #1713

                                      Root on 150 not out.

                                      England on 499-4. Stokes has gone off hurt.

                                      Probably an hour of play left today.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sparkyS Offline
                                        sparkyS Offline
                                        sparky
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1714

                                        And Root was stumped second ball after drinks.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • sparkyS Offline
                                          sparkyS Offline
                                          sparky
                                          wrote on last edited by sparky
                                          #1715

                                          Everyone knows why the Australians called Kevin Pietersen FIGJAM? And apparently the lads in his own dressing room had a seven letter nickname for him.

                                          https://twitter.com/kp24/status/1949015009184403471?s=46

                                          What a piston wristed gibbon!

                                          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search