Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Oh - and Oz win the toss and will bat....
pfffft, who the fuck bats first in Australia?
-
-
Bowling first in all three tests. Tough times.
@No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Bowling first in all three tests. Tough times.
yep. wish we had at least won a toss so we got a choice....
-
also, didn't Henry used to be quite sharp? Like, in 2015?
-
Wow what a line up.
It’ll be a miracle if we don’t lose by an innings.
Ian Smith or Gary Stead must have been close to strapping on the pads.
@Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Wow what a line up.
It’ll be a miracle if we don’t lose by an innings.
Ian Smith or Gary Stead must have been close to strapping on the pads.
I think Peter Fulton would have been more likely, but damn that's an unlikely team. Hope they win, that would be awesome and hilarious.
-
We're paying $14 to win, $5 to draw - if anyone wants a piece of that.
Oz at $1.20 to win is pretty easy money, unless there's a lot of rain coming.
If Timmy is knackered then there's not much point playing him. Matt Henry will need to bowl a lot of overs and there's not that much between Tim and Matt.
-
We really needed about 4 early wickets if we want to keep this within an innings defeat.
-
We're paying $14 to win, $5 to draw - if anyone wants a piece of that.
Oz at $1.20 to win is pretty easy money, unless there's a lot of rain coming.
If Timmy is knackered then there's not much point playing him. Matt Henry will need to bowl a lot of overs and there's not that much between Tim and Matt.
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
We're paying $14 to win, $5 to draw - if anyone wants a piece of that.
Oz at $1.20 to win is pretty easy money, unless there's a lot of rain coming.
If Timmy is knackered then there's not much point playing him. Matt Henry will need to bowl a lot of overs and there's not that much between Tim and Matt.
There's a lot of difference in terms of experience and test record. I also just feel sorry for Southee who missed out on captaincy due to Christchurch.
-
We really needed about 4 early wickets if we want to keep this within an innings defeat.
@No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
We really needed about 4 early wickets if we want to keep this within an innings defeat.
When we bat at the moment you feel that if Williamson gets out cheaply, someone else will make runs. In this game, if Taylor or Latham go cheaply we could struggle to get to 150.
-
Phew, lucky it wasn't Wags' rostered test off.
The Southee omission gives another frown about this team management. Been a few frowns lately
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Phew, lucky it wasn't Wags' rostered test off.
The Southee omission gives another frown about this team management. Been a few frowns lately
Only increases the doubts about Stead's management
-
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Phew, lucky it wasn't Wags' rostered test off.
The Southee omission gives another frown about this team management. Been a few frowns lately
Only increases the doubts about Stead's management
@canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Phew, lucky it wasn't Wags' rostered test off.
The Southee omission gives another frown about this team management. Been a few frowns lately
Only increases the doubts about Stead's management
how he resurrects us mentally after this utter destruction will be the real test.
