Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.4k Posts 62 Posters 128.9k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by westcoastie
    #176

    Ridiculous to state, but we need to have a bit of luck already - otherwise, Australia will bat through to the end of the second session on Day 2 and have a nudge at knocking over our top order quickly. Then we'll need so show some real fight having been out there fielding for a day and a half in 40deg heat.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #177

      I'm in bed. We got a wicket yet?

      westcoastieW 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • westcoastieW Offline
        westcoastieW Offline
        westcoastie
        wrote on last edited by
        #178

        Commentators saying Fergusson is off to get an MRI scan on his calf. FFS. New ball 10-overs away, and we don't have the guy who can biff it down at 145km.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • boobooB booboo

          I'm in bed. We got a wicket yet?

          westcoastieW Offline
          westcoastieW Offline
          westcoastie
          wrote on last edited by
          #179

          @booboo no - but we've lost Fergusson with a calf strain instead...

          boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • westcoastieW westcoastie

            @booboo no - but we've lost Fergusson with a calf strain instead...

            boobooB Offline
            boobooB Offline
            booboo
            wrote on last edited by
            #180

            @westcoastie said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

            @booboo no - but we've lost Fergusson with a calf strain instead...

            Faaark

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • TeWaioT Offline
              TeWaioT Offline
              TeWaio
              wrote on last edited by
              #181

              Bad news for New Zealand. Lachie Ferguson is off the ground and has gone for an MRI on his calf. He won't field again today it seems. He has a suspected right calf strain. They will assess him again in the morning.

              Oh dear.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • DonsteppaD Offline
                DonsteppaD Offline
                Donsteppa
                wrote on last edited by
                #182

                A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                Faark.

                NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • westcoastieW Offline
                  westcoastieW Offline
                  westcoastie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #183

                  hate to be so pessimistic, Santner getting bounce and turn, Lyon is going to look like the second coming of Shane Warne. We're cooked - the recipe - put a Kiwi in the field for two days, slow cooking at 40deg, then rip the top off at 150km hour. Good god.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                    A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                    Faark.

                    NTAN Offline
                    NTAN Offline
                    NTA
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #184

                    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                    A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                    Faark.

                    Any bloke who wants to bowl over 140 in test cricket, really

                    DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #185

                      That is a fucking peach from Timmah

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NTAN NTA

                        @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                        A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                        Faark.

                        Any bloke who wants to bowl over 140 in test cricket, really

                        DonsteppaD Offline
                        DonsteppaD Offline
                        Donsteppa
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #186

                        @NTA said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                        @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                        A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                        Faark.

                        Any bloke who wants to bowl over 140 in test cricket, really

                        Have your trio agreed to slow down their bowling this weekend? πŸ™‚

                        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • NTAN Offline
                          NTAN Offline
                          NTA
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #187

                          Head didn't bat against Pakistan? πŸ€”

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                            @NTA said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                            @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                            A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                            Faark.

                            Any bloke who wants to bowl over 140 in test cricket, really

                            Have your trio agreed to slow down their bowling this weekend? πŸ™‚

                            NTAN Offline
                            NTAN Offline
                            NTA
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #188

                            @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                            @NTA said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                            @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                            A bloke who can bowl over 140kmph consistently in Test cricket for NZ.... would promptly have to get injured.

                            Faark.

                            Any bloke who wants to bowl over 140 in test cricket, really

                            Have your trio agreed to slow down their bowling this weekend? πŸ™‚

                            Or guns are faster than yours? πŸ˜‰

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • NTAN Offline
                              NTAN Offline
                              NTA
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #189

                              Fuck me that is HOOPING in

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                                Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                                Magpie_in_aus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #190

                                Anyone got any stats on players to have three consecutive innings of 100+ could potentially be 3 150+ (hope i don't jinx him....) bloody marnus

                                Magpie_in_ausM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                                  Magpie_in_ausM Offline
                                  Magpie_in_aus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #191

                                  5 others in Aussie with three 100's in a row. Not sure on potential 150's. 1 player with 4 in a row

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • canefanC Away
                                    canefanC Away
                                    canefan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #192

                                    perth.JPG

                                    Oh crap......

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #193

                                      Well, on balance I"m OK with where we got them. 248/4 is in the game, and a couple of quick wickets makes a differnece. WE did well not to get smashed at the back end of the day.

                                      First session tomorrow is critical. Good bowling and fielding from us makes a massive difference; if they get away, 500 is on the cards and we're out of the game.

                                      Also, why the hell does a part timer like CdG look a better bowler than Ferguson/Southee? Wags is just a dead set legend, kind of like Brad Thorne for me - not a typical fast bowler at all, but a very smart and controlled one. Respect to the fella, it's awesome to have him in the team. Any bowler to gets an uncontrolled shot from Smith in his form should get that photograph on his wall πŸ™‚

                                      Going to be tasty tonight, can't wait

                                      NTAN Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      • nzzpN nzzp

                                        Well, on balance I"m OK with where we got them. 248/4 is in the game, and a couple of quick wickets makes a differnece. WE did well not to get smashed at the back end of the day.

                                        First session tomorrow is critical. Good bowling and fielding from us makes a massive difference; if they get away, 500 is on the cards and we're out of the game.

                                        Also, why the hell does a part timer like CdG look a better bowler than Ferguson/Southee? Wags is just a dead set legend, kind of like Brad Thorne for me - not a typical fast bowler at all, but a very smart and controlled one. Respect to the fella, it's awesome to have him in the team. Any bowler to gets an uncontrolled shot from Smith in his form should get that photograph on his wall πŸ™‚

                                        Going to be tasty tonight, can't wait

                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTA
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #194

                                        @nzzp Pretty evenly balanced I'd say. Aussies need to make some hay while the sun shines, then put your blokes into bat just before the second break.

                                        Nigel Llong will take care of the rest πŸ˜‰

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nzzpN nzzp

                                          Well, on balance I"m OK with where we got them. 248/4 is in the game, and a couple of quick wickets makes a differnece. WE did well not to get smashed at the back end of the day.

                                          First session tomorrow is critical. Good bowling and fielding from us makes a massive difference; if they get away, 500 is on the cards and we're out of the game.

                                          Also, why the hell does a part timer like CdG look a better bowler than Ferguson/Southee? Wags is just a dead set legend, kind of like Brad Thorne for me - not a typical fast bowler at all, but a very smart and controlled one. Respect to the fella, it's awesome to have him in the team. Any bowler to gets an uncontrolled shot from Smith in his form should get that photograph on his wall πŸ™‚

                                          Going to be tasty tonight, can't wait

                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #195

                                          @nzzp Yeah - I always have in mind that 220/4 is pretty much par in the first innings unless the pitch or conditions are incredibly difficult. So the Aussies fractionally ahead, but not much in it.

                                          Lachie needs to strap it up and run in once we get to their tail - that's when extra pace can be really handy - getting rid of bowlers who otherwise stick around for handy 30s or 50s.

                                          canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search