Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Blues v Crusaders

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
bluescrusaders
231 Posts 34 Posters 9.0k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB booboo

    Am not sure why Blues supporters are upset. Did anyone really think they had a chance?

    I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference, so if you lose to the Canes and/or the Clan then toys should be thrown with abandon.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #221

    @booboo if you think back to last year, they were only a missed penalty away from beating a much stronger Saders team, there’s nothing wrong with having expectation ..

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • boobooB booboo

      Am not sure why Blues supporters are upset. Did anyone really think they had a chance?

      I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference, so if you lose to the Canes and/or the Clan then toys should be thrown with abandon.

      Canes4lifeC Offline
      Canes4lifeC Offline
      Canes4life
      wrote on last edited by Canes4life
      #222

      @booboo said in Blues v Crusaders:

      I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference

      A confident statement but I'm not really sure your expectations are realistic. The Chiefs, Crusaders and Canes all look alot stronger than the Blues and all have a proven track record of making the playoffs year in and year out. The Blues look like the same rabble of years gone by, a true reflection of a broken culture.

      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

        @booboo said in Blues v Crusaders:

        I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference

        A confident statement but I'm not really sure your expectations are realistic. The Chiefs, Crusaders and Canes all look alot stronger than the Blues and all have a proven track record of making the playoffs year in and year out. The Blues look like the same rabble of years gone by, a true reflection of a broken culture.

        boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by
        #223

        @Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:

        @booboo said in Blues v Crusaders:

        I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference

        A confident statement but I'm not really sure your expectations are realistic. The Chiefs, Crusaders and Canes all look alot stronger than the Blues and all have a proven track record of making the playoffs year in and year out. The Blues look like the same rabble of years gone by, a true reflection of a broken culture.

        They've played three games.

        Two against what I believe are the top two teams in the comp, which they lost. As expected.

        I'm not about to head off to the knee-jerk reaction thread just yet.

        A fortnight with a couple of good results does amazing things for a team's and fan's confidence.

        Imagine if they'd lost any of those games 27 nil (nil!) say.

        Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • boobooB booboo

          @Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:

          @booboo said in Blues v Crusaders:

          I still expect Blues to be third in the NZ conference

          A confident statement but I'm not really sure your expectations are realistic. The Chiefs, Crusaders and Canes all look alot stronger than the Blues and all have a proven track record of making the playoffs year in and year out. The Blues look like the same rabble of years gone by, a true reflection of a broken culture.

          They've played three games.

          Two against what I believe are the top two teams in the comp, which they lost. As expected.

          I'm not about to head off to the knee-jerk reaction thread just yet.

          A fortnight with a couple of good results does amazing things for a team's and fan's confidence.

          Imagine if they'd lost any of those games 27 nil (nil!) say.

          Canes4lifeC Offline
          Canes4lifeC Offline
          Canes4life
          wrote on last edited by Canes4life
          #224

          @booboo yeah but the same old signs are there of a team that wilters when things get tough. They had a massive lead against the Chiefs and blew it and they hardly fired a shot against the Crusaders. For you to say that you expected them to lose is a great reflection of where the mindset around the Blues stands.

          The Canes had a shocker first game (no excuses) but turned around and beat the Jaguares who were on a 10 game winning streak at home, they then returned home and got the job done against a red hot Sharks side. The Canes don't all of a sudden go from Semi-Finalists to the scrap heap just because a certain someone decides to defect North. This is still a very good side, with enough talent in my mind to win the whole thing.

          We will see in a few weeks time where these two teams are at, but I'm picking the Canes to comfortably put away the Blues at home and make it 10 wins in a row.

          nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StargazerS Offline
            StargazerS Offline
            Stargazer
            wrote on last edited by
            #225

            We're three games into the season. Way too early for any conclusions ...

            On top of that, the Blues, Chiefs, Crusaders have played two NZ derbies and the Canes and Highlanders have only played overseas' opposition.

            Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • StargazerS Stargazer

              We're three games into the season. Way too early for any conclusions ...

              On top of that, the Blues, Chiefs, Crusaders have played two NZ derbies and the Canes and Highlanders have only played overseas' opposition.

              Canes4lifeC Offline
              Canes4lifeC Offline
              Canes4life
              wrote on last edited by Canes4life
              #226

              @Stargazer we will see where things are at when the Blues come to town in a few weeks.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                @booboo yeah but the same old signs are there of a team that wilters when things get tough. They had a massive lead against the Chiefs and blew it and they hardly fired a shot against the Crusaders. For you to say that you expected them to lose is a great reflection of where the mindset around the Blues stands.

                The Canes had a shocker first game (no excuses) but turned around and beat the Jaguares who were on a 10 game winning streak at home, they then returned home and got the job done against a red hot Sharks side. The Canes don't all of a sudden go from Semi-Finalists to the scrap heap just because a certain someone decides to defect North. This is still a very good side, with enough talent in my mind to win the whole thing.

                We will see in a few weeks time where these two teams are at, but I'm picking the Canes to comfortably put away the Blues at home and make it 10 wins in a row.

                nzzpN Offline
                nzzpN Offline
                nzzp
                wrote on last edited by
                #227

                @Canes4life said in Blues v Crusaders:

                For you to say that you expected them to lose is a great reflection of where the mindset around the Blues stands.

                You're kidding, right? The TAB expected the Blues to lose; we've on the improve, but you don't go to those games doing anything but hoping for a win.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • BonesB Offline
                  BonesB Offline
                  Bones
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #228

                  A team that withers when things get tough. Loses after having a massive lead. Because it's tough having a massive lead?

                  nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • BonesB Bones

                    A team that withers when things get tough. Loses after having a massive lead. Because it's tough having a massive lead?

                    nzzpN Offline
                    nzzpN Offline
                    nzzp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #229

                    @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

                    A team that withers when things get tough. Loses after having a massive lead. Because it's tough having a massive lead?

                    You obviously haven't had the misfortune of watching the mentally fragile Blues for a while. They're hard to support, adn seem mostly shot mentally. I think we're getting better, but it takes time. Oh god, it takes time.

                    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nzzpN nzzp

                      @Bones said in Blues v Crusaders:

                      A team that withers when things get tough. Loses after having a massive lead. Because it's tough having a massive lead?

                      You obviously haven't had the misfortune of watching the mentally fragile Blues for a while. They're hard to support, adn seem mostly shot mentally. I think we're getting better, but it takes time. Oh god, it takes time.

                      BonesB Offline
                      BonesB Offline
                      Bones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #230

                      @nzzp watched them last weekend! Was just pointing out how odd it is to say they're a team that loses when the going gets tough and use losing after having a big lead to support that.

                      nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • BonesB Bones

                        @nzzp watched them last weekend! Was just pointing out how odd it is to say they're a team that loses when the going gets tough and use losing after having a big lead to support that.

                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzp
                        wrote on last edited by nzzp
                        #231

                        @Bones that chiefs game was heavily influenced by all black substitutions though. Two different sides in each half for each team.

                        Edit; literally a game of two halves. Goddamnit, I finally did it; used a cliche in a genuine and appropriate sense

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Search
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Search