SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs
-
What was that Black.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Much better from zarn
Would've liked Ioane to give him a one on one earlier.
@bones said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Much better from zarn
Would've liked Ioane to give him a one on one earlier.
Rieko still has the winger mindset of going himself every time
-
@hydro11 said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
These referrals need to be binned
Got the right decision earlier.
Only if they ruled that the ball went forward, which is what the Captain’s challenge was for.
-
"Oh another one! Blues have said that they scored but the ref says that they were short.
I assume that now the TMO will say that the try was not scored but that last Tuesday one of the Chiefs players crossed a road without waiting for the lights so it’ll be a penalty try and red card"
An Ozzie view
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
"Oh another one! Blues have said that they scored but the ref says that they were short.
I assume that now the TMO will say that the try was not scored but that last Tuesday one of the Chiefs players crossed a road without waiting for the lights so it’ll be a penalty try and red card"
An Ozzie view
Show me the law where it's a red card for jaywalking.
-
@gt12 it did go forward , just the 1980s pixilated screen the tmo uses its tough to see
@taniwharugby said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@gt12 it did go forward , just the 1980s pixilated screen the tmo uses its tough to see
I know it did too, but my understanding is that was not the ruling.
If so, why uphold the challenge?
-
@hydro11 said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
These referrals need to be binned
Got the right decision earlier.
Only if they ruled that the ball went forward, which is what the Captain’s challenge was for.
@gt12 said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@hydro11 said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
These referrals need to be binned
Got the right decision earlier.
Only if they ruled that the ball went forward, which is what the Captain’s challenge is for.
I can't see much benefit from them. Even if you have clear rules about these referrals where you have to be specific about what you're drawing to the referee's attention so that anything else can't be judged in retrospect. But even then people will get up in arms about a clear transgression not ruled on.
It's a no win situation.
-
@taniwharugby said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@gt12 it did go forward , just the 1980s pixilated screen the tmo uses its tough to see
I know it did too, but my understanding is that was not the ruling.
If so, why uphold the challenge?
-
@gt12 Because it was a direct result of the play in question? Anyone got the text of the challenge law?
-
@taniwharugby said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@gt12 it did go forward , just the 1980s pixilated screen the tmo uses its tough to see
I know it did too, but my understanding is that was not the ruling.
If so, why uphold the challenge?
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Easily the worst game in two Super Rugby Aotearoa seasons.
Awful.
But high on comedy value.
-
@gt12 i dunno, is the challenge dependant on you being correct in your call or is the challenge that the ref missed an infringement/error how it works?
End result is referrals suck balls
@taniwharugby said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@gt12 i dunno, is the challenge dependant on you being correct in your call or is the challenge that the ref missed an infringement/error how it works?
End result is referrals suck balls
You would hope it is the captain’s correctness or you can just guess.
-
@taniwharugby said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@gt12 i dunno, is the challenge dependant on you being correct in your call or is the challenge that the ref missed an infringement/error how it works?
End result is referrals suck balls
You would hope it is the captain’s correctness or you can just guess.
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
"Oh another one! Blues have said that they scored but the ref says that they were short.
I assume that now the TMO will say that the try was not scored but that last Tuesday one of the Chiefs players crossed a road without waiting for the lights so it’ll be a penalty try and red card"
An Ozzie view
Show me the law where it's a red card for jaywalking.
@bones said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
"Oh another one! Blues have said that they scored but the ref says that they were short.
I assume that now the TMO will say that the try was not scored but that last Tuesday one of the Chiefs players crossed a road without waiting for the lights so it’ll be a penalty try and red card"
An Ozzie view
Show me the law where it's a red card for jaywalking.
-
@bones not wrong. I’m glad he left the Canes.
