Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby News

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
5.2k Posts 139 Posters 1.5m Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #1869

    Bulls lock Snyman suspended for four weeks. Three weeks more than Naholo completely justified IMO.

    "With respect to sanction, the Foul Play Review Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of six weeks primarily due to the dangerous nature of the act and the direct contact with the opponent's head. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the player's good judicial record and early guilty plea, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to four weeks."
    

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/92657779/bulls-lock-rg-snyman-cops-four-week-ban-after-red-against-highlanders

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #1870

      Snyman. Yeah him. Four weeks. About right.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • TimT Away
        TimT Away
        Tim
        wrote on last edited by
        #1871

        http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/92656324/crusaders-fullback-israel-dagg-wont-play-against-the-chiefs-in-suva-on-friday

        StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • TimT Tim

          http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/92656324/crusaders-fullback-israel-dagg-wont-play-against-the-chiefs-in-suva-on-friday

          StargazerS Offline
          StargazerS Offline
          Stargazer
          wrote on last edited by Stargazer
          #1872

          @Tim Disappointing for him, the Crusaders and their fans, but maybe it's better to return against a weak team like the Rebels after such a long injury break. If he's fit, I have no doubt he'll be in the AB squad, even if he's only played 2 SR games. Kaino and Read will play less before the Lions tour. There's also the Crusaders v Lions game, and the Maori ABs game, in which Dagg can get game time.

          F 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • StargazerS Stargazer

            @Tim Disappointing for him, the Crusaders and their fans, but maybe it's better to return against a weak team like the Rebels after such a long injury break. If he's fit, I have no doubt he'll be in the AB squad, even if he's only played 2 SR games. Kaino and Read will play less before the Lions tour. There's also the Crusaders v Lions game, and the Maori ABs game, in which Dagg can get game time.

            F Offline
            F Offline
            Frye
            wrote on last edited by
            #1873

            @Stargazer Yeah I can't imagine the pitch is going to be fantastic. Not good rehab coming back from a knee injury.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • ACT CrusaderA Offline
              ACT CrusaderA Offline
              ACT Crusader
              wrote on last edited by
              #1874

              Don't mind Dagg missing the Suva game. We will probably rotate a few players for the Rebels game so a good time to bring Dagg back.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • TimT Away
                TimT Away
                Tim
                wrote on last edited by
                #1875

                Greg Pleasants-Tate will miss this weeks game due to a neck injury suffered from Snyman's shoulder charge. This is particularly worrying for him, as missed almost the entire 2016 Mitre 10 Cup with a neck injury.

                http://superrugby.co.nz/News/30788/highlanders-wary-of-emerging-blues

                Wing Waisake Naholo has headed home after drawing a one-week suspension following his red card and he will prepare for the Waratahs but the side have been joined by first five-eighths Lima Sopoaga, who ran with the squad and Tuesday and was looking good, and hooker Guy Millar who is covering for Greg Pleasants-Tate who suffered a neck injury as a result of the shoulder charge to his face by Bulls lock RG Snyman, who received a four week ban.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • TimT Away
                  TimT Away
                  Tim
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1876

                  "Early on I had a lot of headaches and it was hard to concentrate.

                  "But I'm a lot better now and probably a couple of weeks away [from playing].

                  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=11857789

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • StargazerS Offline
                    StargazerS Offline
                    Stargazer
                    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                    #1877

                    Shaun Treeby cited for foul play (dangerous tackle on Piers Francis)

                    http://www.planetrugby.com/news/treeby-cited-for-foul-play/

                    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/92808139/stormers-centre-shaun-treeby-cited-for-dangerous-tackle-of-piers-francis

                    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                      Shaun Treeby cited for foul play (dangerous tackle on Piers Francis)

                      http://www.planetrugby.com/news/treeby-cited-for-foul-play/

                      http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/92808139/stormers-centre-shaun-treeby-cited-for-dangerous-tackle-of-piers-francis

                      nzzpN Offline
                      nzzpN Offline
                      nzzp
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1878

                      @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

                      Shaun Treeby cited for foul play (dangerous tackle on Piers Francis)

                      Wow. If only a TMO had the time to review that footage during play and see a swinging arm.

                      😐

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      6
                      • StargazerS Offline
                        StargazerS Offline
                        Stargazer
                        wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                        #1879

                        I think Ofa should have been cited, too, but luckily he didn't (as far as I know). At this stage of the competition (so close to the Lions tour), you don't want ABs (even the lesser ones) to get bans, because it might affect their eligibility to play for the ABs.

                        WurzelW 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Stargazer

                          I think Ofa should have been cited, too, but luckily he didn't (as far as I know). At this stage of the competition (so close to the Lions tour), you don't want ABs (even the lesser ones) to get bans, because it might affect their eligibility to play for the ABs.

                          WurzelW Offline
                          WurzelW Offline
                          Wurzel
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1880

                          @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

                          I think Ofa should have been cited, too, but luckily he didn't (as far as I know). At this stage of the competition (so close to the Lions tour), you don't want ABs (even the lesser ones) to get bans, because it might affect their eligibility to play for the ABs.

                          I'd be happy for Ofa to get a ban if we are considering him to play the Lions

                          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • WurzelW Wurzel

                            @Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:

                            I think Ofa should have been cited, too, but luckily he didn't (as far as I know). At this stage of the competition (so close to the Lions tour), you don't want ABs (even the lesser ones) to get bans, because it might affect their eligibility to play for the ABs.

                            I'd be happy for Ofa to get a ban if we are considering him to play the Lions

                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1881

                            0_1495327804907_Capture.PNG

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • KruseK Offline
                              KruseK Offline
                              Kruse
                              wrote on last edited by Kruse
                              #1882

                              I'm still lovin' the fact that 6 of the Brumbies' points are losing BonusPoints.
                              If anybody can be arsed, a table using current Conference rules but without the BPs?
                              (I actually agree with the BP system, it's just... another way of putting the boot into the Oz teams, and how shit they are. And SA. And shit - in a system when the local teams play each other more than anybody else, yet a single "conference" is still dominant... WTF?)

                              taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • KruseK Kruse

                                I'm still lovin' the fact that 6 of the Brumbies' points are losing BonusPoints.
                                If anybody can be arsed, a table using current Conference rules but without the BPs?
                                (I actually agree with the BP system, it's just... another way of putting the boot into the Oz teams, and how shit they are. And SA. And shit - in a system when the local teams play each other more than anybody else, yet a single "conference" is still dominant... WTF?)

                                taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugby
                                wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                                #1883

                                @Kruse couldnt quite be arsed, here is table based purely on wins, no BPs

                                0_1495331224598_Capture.PNG

                                StargazerS KruseK 2 Replies Last reply
                                1
                                • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                  @Kruse couldnt quite be arsed, here is table based purely on wins, no BPs

                                  0_1495331224598_Capture.PNG

                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  Stargazer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1884

                                  @taniwharugby So, without bonus points, you would still get the same finalists under the current format, but in a different order because the Highlanders have moved up the table.

                                  With bonus points, the QF after this round would be:
                                  Crusaders v Sharks
                                  Lions v Highlanders
                                  Stormers v Chiefs
                                  Brumbies v Hurricanes

                                  Without bonus points, the Lions would play the Chiefs and the Stormers would play the Highlanders.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TimT Away
                                    TimT Away
                                    Tim
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1885

                                    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/92815381/hurricanes-leave-dane-coles-nehe-milnerskudder-at-home-for-south-africa-trip

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • No QuarterN Offline
                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1886

                                      Bloody hell we need Coles to come right for the Lions, all of the other options make me nervous.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Away
                                        A Away
                                        akan004
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1887

                                        Taylor, Harris and Coltman will do a reasonable job. That's the weakest position for the Lions, they don't really have any world class hookers in their squad.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                          @Kruse couldnt quite be arsed, here is table based purely on wins, no BPs

                                          0_1495331224598_Capture.PNG

                                          KruseK Offline
                                          KruseK Offline
                                          Kruse
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1888

                                          @taniwharugby Cheers - I was mostly wondering if the table looked any more ridiculous with guaranteed spots for each conference leader - but not really.
                                          With BPs - Brumbies with 23 points sit above Hurricanes with 43
                                          Without BPs - Brumbies with 16 points sit above Hurricanes with 36
                                          And now that I summarise the point I was wondering about to that extent - I realise it was ridiculously easy to do some basic subtraction to figure that out myself. But then, some bastard had "triggered" me into buying a bottle of whisky on Friday, and my vague memory of posting the question could be explained by that.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search