2022 School rugby
-
According to the South Africans online ,
No one stands a chance against their school .
@kiwiinmelb said in 2022 School rugby:
According to the South Africans online ,
No one stands a chance against their school .
Yeah, I watched the first few minutes of the Grey-Trinity match but the chat was painful to read. So this wasn't this years Grey 1st XV but it's not like other teams don't have younger players too. There are a number of YR11 and 12 players in the Hamilton BHS team. The 1st 5 was making his debut.
I am surprised that Grey College didn't win by more based on their start and the difference in size of their players compared to Trinity. There are some big boys there!
-
The full results yesterday were:
Hamilton Boy’s High School (NZ) 56 - 0 Odyssey XV
St Michael’s College (IRE) 11 - 12 Cardiff & Vale College (WLS)
Sedbergh School (ENG) 10 - 15 Millfield School (ENG)
Grey College (SA) 22 - 7 Trinity School (ENG)SFs will be:
Hamilton Boy’s High School vs Millfield School
Cardiff & Vale College vs Grey College -
Semi final results:
Grey College 14 - 11 Cardiff & Vale
Hamilton BHS 14 - 0 Millfield SchoolHBHS's handling was really poor in this game. They dropped the ball at least four times on or near the goal line, three times in the 1st half alone. Should have scored 30+ points.
The SA ref (who officiated in one of the NZ U19 tour games) was determined to penalise HBHS off the park. He was particularly harsh on attacking breakdowns and didn't reward the dominant scrum. And then there was the clear try in the 1st half that wasn't given as he said it was held up.
I'd be wanting a better performance in the final. One thing I have noticed is that the starting forward pack is quite different to that which played in the Super 8 and Top 4. A starting prop and lock are on the bench and the 7 and 8 have swapped positions. Spencer finally played and looked really dangerous in the 1st half especially, but still no sign of the 1st 5 Lunjevich.
-
Semi final results:
Grey College 14 - 11 Cardiff & Vale
Hamilton BHS 14 - 0 Millfield SchoolHBHS's handling was really poor in this game. They dropped the ball at least four times on or near the goal line, three times in the 1st half alone. Should have scored 30+ points.
The SA ref (who officiated in one of the NZ U19 tour games) was determined to penalise HBHS off the park. He was particularly harsh on attacking breakdowns and didn't reward the dominant scrum. And then there was the clear try in the 1st half that wasn't given as he said it was held up.
I'd be wanting a better performance in the final. One thing I have noticed is that the starting forward pack is quite different to that which played in the Super 8 and Top 4. A starting prop and lock are on the bench and the 7 and 8 have swapped positions. Spencer finally played and looked really dangerous in the 1st half especially, but still no sign of the 1st 5 Lunjevich.
@Bovidae One of those dropped balls near the try line. Great fend though.
-
@Bovidae One of those dropped balls near the try line. Great fend though.
@Stargazer Tom McCarthy isn't a big hooker but seems very strong for his size and carries the ball well - usually.
-
@Bovidae some Saffas on social media are saying this was thier 'junior' side or thier 2nd 15 otherwise thier top side would have destroyed all comers.
-
@Bovidae some Saffas on social media are saying this was thier 'junior' side or thier 2nd 15 otherwise thier top side would have destroyed all comers.
@taniwharugby Yeah, those comments have been made throughout the tournament. Of course, I could point out that the Hamilton BHS team also included 15 and 16 year olds. They weren't as big as those Saffers though. There was also a SA ref.
They turned the chat off because there was so much BS in the comments I read for the SF games. I muted the commentary too.
The Festival hasn't been as good as many thought, so if this is just the first year I hope they get a more international flavour (e.g., an Australian team) in the future. But if it's to be held at this time we'll hear the same comments from the South Africans due to their school year. The Sannix tournament was the same for NZ teams as the team that qualified was usually very different to the team that participated early the following year. I just look at something like this as an opportunity for 1st XVs to tour and play international opposition.
-
@Bovidae some Saffas on social media are saying this was thier 'junior' side or thier 2nd 15 otherwise thier top side would have destroyed all comers.
@taniwharugby said in 2022 School rugby:
@Bovidae some Saffas on social media are saying this was thier 'junior' side or thier 2nd 15 otherwise thier top side would have destroyed all comers.
Tough titties to them that they took their opposition too lightly to think they could beat them without their "top side" then.
-
@Bovidae One of those dropped balls near the try line. Great fend though.
@Stargazer said in 2022 School rugby:
@Bovidae One of those dropped balls near the try line. Great fend though.
"Stiff arm"?
Not sure they know what such a thing is.
-
@taniwharugby Yeah, those comments have been made throughout the tournament. Of course, I could point out that the Hamilton BHS team also included 15 and 16 year olds. They weren't as big as those Saffers though. There was also a SA ref.
They turned the chat off because there was so much BS in the comments I read for the SF games. I muted the commentary too.
The Festival hasn't been as good as many thought, so if this is just the first year I hope they get a more international flavour (e.g., an Australian team) in the future. But if it's to be held at this time we'll hear the same comments from the South Africans due to their school year. The Sannix tournament was the same for NZ teams as the team that qualified was usually very different to the team that participated early the following year. I just look at something like this as an opportunity for 1st XVs to tour and play international opposition.
@Bovidae yeah I read many of those coms .
South Africans , bitter wether they are winning or losing -
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that context -
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that context@98blueandgold said in 2022 School rugby:
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that contextI think Rotorua Boys' missed this memo ....
-
@98blueandgold said in 2022 School rugby:
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that contextI think Rotorua Boys' missed this memo ....
@Rapido said in 2022 School rugby:
@98blueandgold said in 2022 School rugby:
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that contextI think Rotorua Boys' missed this memo ....
I don't think Fijian birth certificates count in NZ so they do it by day of arrival in NZ.
-
@98blueandgold said in 2022 School rugby:
SA whinging about not being their 1stXV but only because they play under 19 where as this tournament and the rest of the world play under 18. So their ‘1stXV’ are all under 19.
Need to understand that contextI think Rotorua Boys' missed this memo ....
@Rapido said in 2022 School rugby:
I think Rotorua Boys' missed this memo ....
Didn't they change the regulations about this, as too many teams were fielding teams full of Year 14s?
I seem to remember a kid this year at my school who thought he was returning to play 1st XV, only to be told he was too old and they wouldn't field him.
Indeed, here it is: https://www.nzsssc.co.nz/Sport-1/Events/Eligibility-Regulations
-
I think a few players did return after the covid-interrupted years but most would have been young Yr13s that turned 18 during their return year.
@Bovidae Correct: we had several boys stay that otherwise would have left, so they could play 1st XV, having missed out due to Covid.
The current rules do make it quite hard for Year 14s though. And also those overseas players who drop back a year on arrival in NZ. We've had Year 13s too old to play 1st XV, having arrived late from the Islands.
