Crusaders v Blues

[TJ]

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

Yeah, he wilted a bit under the pressure. Good experience for him to improve from.

I prefer Sullivan at 15, but Perofeta has been good for us at ten.

Absolutely, think he is a good player and will learn from it, but definitely the right call to take him off in this game

[Tim]

Hats off to Goodhue as well. Outplayed some All Blacks this year.

[Dan54]

I am prepared to say I pretty keen to see Dalton have a run at 6 sometime, in saying that he was brilliant tonight at 7.

[Duluth]

@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

Hats off to Goodhue as well. Outplayed some All Blacks this year.

Absolutely. I’ve been critical of him in the past.. particularly his lack of physicality. Not this year.

He’s responded really well to being a senior lock

[Bones]

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

[pakman]

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

He was at fullback, and may have been overplaying at times. But at that point BB was kicking very poorly, and Perofeta is more calculating.

[chimoaus]

I really like the look of Sullivan, he seems to have space and time and that boot is incredible. I hope he continues to develop in the Blues environment.

[Kirwan]

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

[Kirwan]

@tim said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

Our looses completely dominated theirs.

Not being a dick here, but honestly didn't notice Blackadder at all. Big Red had his number.

I thought he had been subbed in the second half.

[Duluth]

Grace was ok, but a long way behind Sotutu

[Bones]

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

[Kirwan]

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

[Crazy Horse]

It's weird, I hardly ever notice Papali'i even when I am looking out for him. Maybe he needs a hair cut that stands out.

[Bones]

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

Worse? Nice try

No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

[Kirwan]

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

Worse? Nice try

No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

Looks at the scoreboard. Seems ok.

BB played well.

[TJ]

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

Worse? Nice try

No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

Absolutely he was playing worse.

[Bones]

@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:

It's weird, I hardly ever notice Papali'i even when I am looking out for him. Maybe he needs a hair cut that stands out.

That is pretty weird when anytime there's a big defensive play, he's there!

[Kirwan]

@crazy-horse said in Crusaders v Blues:

It's weird, I hardly ever notice Papali'i even when I am looking out for him. Maybe he needs a hair cut that stands out.

He was the dude scoring trys and making all the tackles.

[Bones]

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

Worse? Nice try

No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

Looks at the scoreboard. Seems ok.

BB played well.

Any idea what the score was when Perofeta went off?

[Bones]

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@kirwan said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

@tj said in Crusaders v Blues:

@pakman said in Crusaders v Blues:

@bones said in Crusaders v Blues:

Unlucky saders, might have been a different result without Barrett brain spasms.

Congrats blues! Can't help but think Beauds should have gone off and Perofeta stayed on...

Bones, you and I are at one on that. Perofeta would have been much more measured.

Yea, cos Perofeta was playing amazing rugby before he came off... there is some absolute rubbish mentioned on here.

No you're right, Barrett closed it out perfectly.

So your solution is move the player missing easy kicks at goal and falling over chasing kicks to run the ship?

BB was instrumental in us winning that game.

He was also instrumental in the crusaders nearly winning that game.

Again, the solution to that is not replacing him with a player playing worse.

Worse? Nice try

No you're right. Barrett closed it out perfectly.

Absolutely he was playing worse.

Any examples? That aren't matched by Barrett doing something equally as gross?