Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

SF Crusaders v Chiefs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefscrusaders
589 Posts 53 Posters 31.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by Nepia
    #521

    Did you guys have a different interview from the one I've got where Marshall's ex asked him the same question 3 times over and he said the Crusaders were good for the win, rued the fact the Chiefs didn't take their chances, and was clearly gutted at the loss.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • DiceD Offline
      DiceD Offline
      Dice
      wrote on last edited by
      #522

      For a guy so big, Takei'aho's motor is something else. He's just into everything.

      He had 24 carries and 10 tackles. Most of those carries were quality too.

      I don't think I've seen a player have 24 carries before. Is that a record?

      Canes4lifeC Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
      15
      • N Nevorian

        Did I just hear the Crusaders are going to Eden Park next week?

        YeetyaahY Offline
        YeetyaahY Offline
        Yeetyaah
        wrote on last edited by
        #523

        @Nevorian said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

        Did I just hear the Crusaders are going to Eden Park next week?

        Yeah they leaked the script

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrucialC Crucial

          I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

          YeetyaahY Offline
          YeetyaahY Offline
          Yeetyaah
          wrote on last edited by
          #524

          @Crucial said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

          I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

          One bashed his Mrs and the other didn't so speaks volumes

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • DiceD Dice

            For a guy so big, Takei'aho's motor is something else. He's just into everything.

            He had 24 carries and 10 tackles. Most of those carries were quality too.

            I don't think I've seen a player have 24 carries before. Is that a record?

            Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4life
            wrote on last edited by Canes4life
            #525

            @Dice Samisoni surely has that 2 locked up for the All Blacks. He just gets better and better.#beastmode

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • BonesB Online
              BonesB Online
              Bones
              wrote on last edited by
              #526

              Holy stink up the place chiefs. That was a stunning display of yuuuuck.

              Congratulations crusaders, tenacious stuff.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • antipodeanA Online
                antipodeanA Online
                antipodean
                wrote on last edited by
                #527

                Looking at the game statistics, imagine the score line if Hall, Mo'unga and Jordan swapped with their counterparts.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • African MonkeyA African Monkey

                  @Chris Alright mate settle down haha your team won lol.

                  ChrisC Online
                  ChrisC Online
                  Chris
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #528

                  @African-Monkey said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

                  @Chris Alright mate settle down haha your team won lol.

                  He is a tool he should be no where near an AB jersey.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ChrisC Online
                    ChrisC Online
                    Chris
                    wrote on last edited by Chris
                    #529

                    Big games from a Crusader viewpoint by Grace, Barrett and good work of the bench from McAlister,Newell,Williams and Strange

                    Mounga,Jordan, Havilli were very good
                    Ennor and Bridge good of the bench.

                    Chiefs

                    ST,
                    Tao’Vai
                    Vaa’i

                    Were the best I thought

                    broughieB 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      Webber - be a leader and take responsibility. It is after all partly your fault.

                      FrankF Offline
                      FrankF Offline
                      Frank
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #530

                      @antipodean said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

                      Webber - be a leader and take responsibility. It is after all partly your fault.

                      It's not the SJW way.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ARHSA Offline
                        ARHSA Offline
                        ARHS
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #531

                        Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
                        Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

                        Canes4lifeC CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                        5
                        • ARHSA ARHS

                          Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
                          Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

                          Canes4lifeC Online
                          Canes4lifeC Online
                          Canes4life
                          wrote on last edited by Canes4life
                          #532

                          @ARHS they need to get rid of Trask, Lowe and Tiatia, they are all very limited players. Getting McKenzie back will be huge.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • ARHSA ARHS

                            Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
                            Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

                            CrucialC Offline
                            CrucialC Offline
                            Crucial
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #533

                            @ARHS said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

                            Chiefs need a back 3 with higher work rate and game smarts next year. They pose almost no threat when ball gets kicked to them or passed out wide and rarely feature in kick chases. My feeling is that is why other teams can force so many errors on Chiefs attack and defence... because they don't have a strike player with anticipation and speed. So defenders only have to cover the options in the centre of the park.
                            Must be gutting for the front row after their huge performance tonight.

                            We did know all of this at the start of the season. Going any further than we did depended on Ioane being the AB candidate he was once and for three of the back three options to play better than they ever had before.
                            Glaring weaknesses right from the squad selection but there’s only so many of those guys in the game and we didn’t manage to get any of them.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • boobooB Offline
                              boobooB Offline
                              booboo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #534

                              Meh. Well done Sith.

                              Great D.

                              Dumb attack by Chiefies.

                              Some calls early marginally in Sith's favour (QT YC could have gone penalty only, Matera could have gone Red ... btw second YC was straight red ... but little difference). And a couple of others I can't remember.

                              What the FUCK was PGS doing when he did everything he could not to score? Fucking seriously.

                              Otherwise hats off to the Saders.

                              F KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
                              3
                              • boobooB booboo

                                Meh. Well done Sith.

                                Great D.

                                Dumb attack by Chiefies.

                                Some calls early marginally in Sith's favour (QT YC could have gone penalty only, Matera could have gone Red ... btw second YC was straight red ... but little difference). And a couple of others I can't remember.

                                What the FUCK was PGS doing when he did everything he could not to score? Fucking seriously.

                                Otherwise hats off to the Saders.

                                F Offline
                                F Offline
                                Frye
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #535

                                @booboo I think he was looking to pass infield to improve the angle. Incredibly poor decision.

                                boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • F Frye

                                  @booboo I think he was looking to pass infield to improve the angle. Incredibly poor decision.

                                  boobooB Offline
                                  boobooB Offline
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #536

                                  @Frye fucked

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • CrucialC Crucial

                                    I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

                                    Crazy HorseC Offline
                                    Crazy HorseC Offline
                                    Crazy Horse
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #537

                                    @Crucial said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

                                    I also expect all those Saders posters that declared QT a cock last week to chime in on what a bigger cock Reece is

                                    No need. You won the argument last week - nothing wrong with a bit of niggle 😀

                                    But in all seriousness, it was a acknowledged last week that Reece can be a cock with the niggle too.

                                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gt12G Offline
                                      gt12G Offline
                                      gt12
                                      wrote on last edited by gt12
                                      #538

                                      Expected result. Crusaders are going to Sade.

                                      Joane has been a bust and isn’t worth re-signing. I thought it was a good idea, but I was 100% wrong.

                                      Without Dmac back at 10, we’ll be fighting for 3rd best NZ team again next year. Gatland isn’t good enough to win Super rugby.

                                      Our back three is a fucking mess and needs a significant overhaul.

                                      I cant be fucked writing a long enough article for a year review but:

                                      • props are getting better although we might need a new TH
                                      • lock is a position of strength
                                      • loosies are useful but we rely on PGS not doing dumb things, hopefully Finau will continue to develop
                                      • halfback needs some decisions, Weber is no longer a running threat
                                      • first five needs Dmac then to develop Reihana or another option
                                      • midfield could be good, however QT looks average without ALB, losing Sullivan has proven to be a bad move, but hopefully Wrampling will develop.
                                      • wings are average, Lowe is our best but we need better quality, I’d move a few of them along
                                      • we need a quality fullback and a couple of players (apart from 10) who can help with the kicking game.

                                      I doubt we’ll cut loose the shit BOP outsides so if we get Dmac back we’ll likely stay the 3rd/4th best NZ side, so another semifinal exit would be a good achievement.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • FrankF Offline
                                        FrankF Offline
                                        Frank
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #539

                                        QT does not look to be much more than a bash merchant with a not particularly good passing game.

                                        boobooB BonesB Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
                                        5
                                        • FrankF Frank

                                          QT does not look to be much more than a bash merchant with a not particularly good passing game.

                                          boobooB Offline
                                          boobooB Offline
                                          booboo
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #540

                                          @Frank said in SF Crusaders v Chiefs:

                                          QT does not look to be much more than a bash merchant with a not particularly good passing game.

                                          And is he that great at bashing?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search