Foster, Robertson etc
-
@ACT-Crusader
The sauce is in another Foster thread (it is a poster on here)@Frank said in Will Foster go?:
@ACT-Crusader
The sauce is in another Foster thread (it is a poster on here)Can you tell us which one - I don't have all night to search through them all.
-
Hopefully not true although something similar was mentioned on stuff today.
https://twitter.com/martindevlinnz/status/1556544005730537472?t=xUPVY6sI7lbhBClXEDdXMA&s=19
@akan004 that kind of reads like more changes to the assistants than Fozzie getting the pip. But if there is a change in head coach and it isn't Razor, then I expect riots. Even if things have changed and Schmidt has decided he will/can travel if NZ Rugby keep cockblocking Robertson there will be many, many, unhappy fans.
Shit. That means it's gonna happen aye?
Fuck.
-
@Frank said in Will Foster go?:
@ACT-Crusader
The sauce is in another Foster thread (it is a poster on here)Can you tell us which one - I don't have all night to search through them all.
-
I should qualify that post (lol a ban offence around here!) that I really like and rate Schmidt. But I want Razor in charge with Schmidt working with him on selection and driving development and scouting. If any changes come with a clear transition plan to Razor post 2023 and he's cool with that then I could handle that jandal. Just!
-
@akan004 that kind of reads like more changes to the assistants than Fozzie getting the pip. But if there is a change in head coach and it isn't Razor, then I expect riots. Even if things have changed and Schmidt has decided he will/can travel if NZ Rugby keep cockblocking Robertson there will be many, many, unhappy fans.
Shit. That means it's gonna happen aye?
Fuck.
@Paekakboyz Who knows. Hopefully it's a bit like that unfounded rumour about Cane losing his captaincy.
The other possibility is that he turned them down and I can see why Razor might not want the top job now, he's got a year to turn this rubble around and we probably don't have the cattle to win the RWC regardless of the coach, so it's a risky job to take atm.
-
@Frank said in Will Foster go?:
@ACT-Crusader
The sauce is in another Foster thread (it is a poster on here)Normally a good sauce too.
Close to the action that posters sauce.@Chris said in Will Foster go?:
@Frank said in Will Foster go?:
@ACT-Crusader
The sauce is in another Foster thread (it is a poster on here)Normally a good sauce too.
Close to the action that posters sauce.ah ok, it's that one. I thought there was new sauce
-
I should qualify that post (lol a ban offence around here!) that I really like and rate Schmidt. But I want Razor in charge with Schmidt working with him on selection and driving development and scouting. If any changes come with a clear transition plan to Razor post 2023 and he's cool with that then I could handle that jandal. Just!
@Paekakboyz said in Will Foster go?:
I should qualify that post (lol a ban offence around here!) that I really like and rate Schmidt. But I want Razor in charge with Schmidt working with him on selection and driving development and scouting. If any changes come with a clear transition plan to Razor post 2023 and he's cool with that then I could handle that jandal. Just!
Schmidt as NZ DoR makes sense. It is NZ based and it allows him to use his attention to detail to put in place a long term strategy to identify talent and develop players and coaches fit for the test arena. It is a long term job, but it fits in with his strengths and removes any need for him to travel.
-
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
-
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
-
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
@stodders said in Will Foster go?:
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
Considering his history I'd unkindly suggest they've achieved in spite of him.
-
@stodders said in Will Foster go?:
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
Considering his history I'd unkindly suggest they've achieved in spite of him.
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
@stodders said in Will Foster go?:
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
Considering his history I'd unkindly suggest they've achieved in spite of him.
Hehe. I know. In 2021 he nearly walked because of the Women's rugby debacle, but you can't deny he has been in place for a number of years and the Irish setup is now humming. He is the most powerful man in Irish rugby in reality because he is responsible for all High performance across all age groups and both sexes.
-
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?" -
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"Done
The two threads merged were “Will Foster go” & “Foster must go”
It was redundant. People were saying the same thing in both threads and even cross referencing posts
-
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
@stodders said in Will Foster go?:
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
Considering his history I'd unkindly suggest they've achieved in spite of him.
Hehe. I know. In 2021 he nearly walked because of the Women's rugby debacle, but you can't deny he has been in place for a number of years and the Irish setup is now humming. He is the most powerful man in Irish rugby in reality because he is responsible for all High performance across all age groups and both sexes.
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
@stodders said in Will Foster go?:
@antipodean said in Will Foster go?:
Has a Director of Rugby position been successful anywhere?
Ireland. Nucifora.
Considering his history I'd unkindly suggest they've achieved in spite of him.
Hehe. I know. In 2021 he nearly walked because of the Women's rugby debacle, but you can't deny he has been in place for a number of years and the Irish setup is now humming. He is the most powerful man in Irish rugby in reality because he is responsible for all High performance across all age groups and both sexes.
Has been a total success in Ireland. Ireland should be the envy of the NZRU. They have really got their shît together. Although munster is somewhat faded these days.
-
Whoever takes over from Foster now has a hell of a job ahead of them as the players confidence looks shot.
-
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"Done
The two threads merged were “Will Foster go” & “Foster must go”
It was redundant. People were saying the same thing in both threads and even cross referencing posts
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"Done
The two threads merged were “Will Foster go” & “Foster must go”
It was redundant. People were saying the same thing in both threads and even cross referencing posts
I was very confused, I clicked on the combined thread and it took me to a post 23 days ago on page 5.
-
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"Done
The two threads merged were “Will Foster go” & “Foster must go”
It was redundant. People were saying the same thing in both threads and even cross referencing posts
I was very confused, I clicked on the combined thread and it took me to a post 23 days ago on page 5.
@Damo said in Will Foster go?:
Why was the Will Foster go thread merged with the Fozzie out thread?
They're 2 different questions.
Yes, true. But...
I guess because the "discussions" in each are exactly the same, and it's getting kinda boring reading the same shit again and again in half-a-dozen different threads.
Edit: Perhaps the new merged thread should be named "Foster?"Done
The two threads merged were “Will Foster go” & “Foster must go”
It was redundant. People were saying the same thing in both threads and even cross referencing posts
I was very confused, I clicked on the combined thread and it took me to a post 23 days ago on page 5.
Yeah same, I almost upvoted one of my own posts without realising thinking this guy knows what he's talking about
-
@Paekakboyz Who knows. Hopefully it's a bit like that unfounded rumour about Cane losing his captaincy.
The other possibility is that he turned them down and I can see why Razor might not want the top job now, he's got a year to turn this rubble around and we probably don't have the cattle to win the RWC regardless of the coach, so it's a risky job to take atm.
@Paekakboyz Who knows. Hopefully it's a bit like that unfounded rumour about Cane losing his captaincy.
The other possibility is that he turned them down and I can see why Razor might not want the top job now, he's got a year to turn this rubble around and we probably don't have the cattle to win the RWC regardless of the coach, so it's a risky job to take atm.
TBH, he would lose mana for me if that was the case. The cattle would be the same if he got the job back in 2020 and considering they're a rubble he basically has a free pass to stuff up over the next year and still be the coach after the RWC.
-
@Paekakboyz Who knows. Hopefully it's a bit like that unfounded rumour about Cane losing his captaincy.
The other possibility is that he turned them down and I can see why Razor might not want the top job now, he's got a year to turn this rubble around and we probably don't have the cattle to win the RWC regardless of the coach, so it's a risky job to take atm.
TBH, he would lose mana for me if that was the case. The cattle would be the same if he got the job back in 2020 and considering they're a rubble he basically has a free pass to stuff up over the next year and still be the coach after the RWC.
TBH, he would lose mana for me if that was the case. The cattle would be the same if he got the job back in 2020 and considering they're a rubble he basically has a free pass to stuff up over the next year and still be the coach after the RWC.
I don't know if any of the coaches are decent stonemasons.
