Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.1k Posts 81 Posters 81.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HigginsH Higgins

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

    Bristol was basically an academy team. Reds were full strength, even if first game of the season

    It doesn't say that on the picture. No mention other than the home side being the Bristol Bears so to the casual observer it is the best team they could field on the day. Not Queensland's fault Bristol accepted a game when they knew they would be below full strength and still calling their team as the Bristol Bears and not Bristol Bear Development XV. Queensland did right by giving them an utter flogging.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #425

    @Higgins said in Super Rugby 2025:

    @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

    Bristol was basically an academy team. Reds were full strength, even if first game of the season

    It doesn't say that on the picture. No mention other than the home side being the Bristol Bears so to the casual observer it is the best team they could field on the day. Not Queensland's fault Bristol accepted a game when they knew they would be below full strength and still calling their team as the Bristol Bears and not Bristol Bear Development XV. Queensland did right by giving them an utter flogging.

    Correct. But it doesn't negate my point that this game was in no way an indicator of the relative strengths of SR Vs NH club rugby. It was a stupid money making attempt, and I doubt any profit was made apart from a good confidence boost for the Reds

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • BovidaeB Offline
      BovidaeB Offline
      Bovidae
      wrote on last edited by
      #426

      https://www.rugby.com.au/news/five-things-we-learnt-from-nsw-waratahs-v-act-brumbies-trial-202521

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        WoodysRFC
        wrote on last edited by
        #427

        https://www.rugby.com.au/news/super-rugby-pacific-introduces-player-of-the-year-award-for-2025-season-202523

        Feels long overdue

        1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • HigginsH Higgins

          @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

          Bristol was basically an academy team. Reds were full strength, even if first game of the season

          It doesn't say that on the picture. No mention other than the home side being the Bristol Bears so to the casual observer it is the best team they could field on the day. Not Queensland's fault Bristol accepted a game when they knew they would be below full strength and still calling their team as the Bristol Bears and not Bristol Bear Development XV. Queensland did right by giving them an utter flogging.

          KiwiwombleK Offline
          KiwiwombleK Offline
          Kiwiwomble
          wrote on last edited by
          #428

          @Higgins said in Super Rugby 2025:

          @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

          Bristol was basically an academy team. Reds were full strength, even if first game of the season

          It doesn't say that on the picture. No mention other than the home side being the Bristol Bears so to the casual observer it is the best team they could field on the day. Not Queensland's fault Bristol accepted a game when they knew they would be below full strength and still calling their team as the Bristol Bears and not Bristol Bear Development XV. Queensland did right by giving them an utter flogging.

          think you completely missed the point

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Daffy JaffyD Offline
            Daffy JaffyD Offline
            Daffy Jaffy
            wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
            #429

            From the Highlanders - Live stream -
            0963e732-aaaa-4103-bb8b-5b3ae34e17a8-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • BovidaeB Offline
              BovidaeB Offline
              Bovidae
              wrote on last edited by
              #430

              For the live stream:

              You will sign up on our website (www.thehighlanders.co.nz) to get the link straight to your inbox (we'll post on our pages later this week too).

              KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • BovidaeB Bovidae

                For the live stream:

                You will sign up on our website (www.thehighlanders.co.nz) to get the link straight to your inbox (we'll post on our pages later this week too).

                KiwiwombleK Offline
                KiwiwombleK Offline
                Kiwiwomble
                wrote on last edited by
                #431

                @Bovidae good catch 👍

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • antipodeanA Online
                  antipodeanA Online
                  antipodean
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #432

                  Reading through the team specific threads for this year's comp I get the feeling there's a lot of injuries in the squads.

                  Is the number normal or am I just paying more attention this year?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • BovidaeB Offline
                    BovidaeB Offline
                    Bovidae
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #433

                    Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • BovidaeB Bovidae

                      Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #434

                      @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2025:

                      Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                      The players have realised that razor doesn't give a shit about SR form, so might as well give it a miss

                      NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • M Machpants

                        @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2025:

                        Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                        The players have realised that razor doesn't give a shit about SR form, so might as well give it a miss

                        NepiaN Online
                        NepiaN Online
                        Nepia
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #435

                        @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

                        @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2025:

                        Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                        The players have realised that razor doesn't give a shit about SR form, so might as well give it a miss

                        More and more are trying the Blackadder method of AB selection.

                        canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • NepiaN Nepia

                          @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                          The players have realised that razor doesn't give a shit about SR form, so might as well give it a miss

                          More and more are trying the Blackadder method of AB selection.

                          canefanC Away
                          canefanC Away
                          canefan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #436

                          @Nepia said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          @Machpants said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          @Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          Also mentioned amongst the coaches that there is only a 3-week lead-in to the competition opener compared to 4 weeks in 2024. There seems to have been a lot of off-season surgeries.

                          The players have realised that razor doesn't give a shit about SR form, so might as well give it a miss

                          More and more are trying the Blackadder method of AB selection.

                          Only works if you wear red and black....

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by Bovidae
                            #437

                            A much more competitive game for Qld against Ulster. The article says that Aidan Morgan played well for Ulster. The Reds won 38-31.

                            https://www.rugby.com.au/news/five-things-we-learned-from-reds-ulster-202527

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                              Daffy JaffyD Offline
                              Daffy Jaffy
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #438

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Dan54D Offline
                                Dan54D Offline
                                Dan54
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #439

                                What night are teams named? I thought there was a day that all teams needed to be named this year??
                                Wondering if in future weeks I should wait until teams named before doing my picks or just carry on closing my eyes and using a pin.

                                SouthernMannS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                  Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                  Daffy Jaffy
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #440

                                  New law innovations for Super Rugby Pacific in 2025 include:

                                  • Time restrictions (conversions and penalty goals): Players will have 60 seconds to attempt conversions and penalty goals. This was previously 90 seconds for conversions.

                                  • Play on from not-straight lineout throws: If the non-throwing team does not lift a teammate to compete for the ball, then play shall continue. If the non-throwing team lifts a teammate to compete for the ball, a free kick is awarded to the non-throwing team. The awarding of a free kick rather than a scrum is a change to the World Rugby law trial specific to Super Rugby Pacific, to promote the flow of game.

                                  • Protection of 9 at ruck, maul and defensive positions at scrum:

                                  Ruck: A player who is, or was part of the ruck may not play an opponent who is near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.
                                  Maul: A player who is, or was part of the maul may not play an opponent near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.
                                  Scrum: Once play in the scrum begins, the scrum half of the team not in possession takes up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel.

                                  • Starting play in Super Point: The team who scores the first try in regular time has the choice to kick off or receive in Super Point, which was formerly known as Golden Point. This replaces the coin toss.
                                  antipodeanA NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Dan54D Dan54

                                    What night are teams named? I thought there was a day that all teams needed to be named this year??
                                    Wondering if in future weeks I should wait until teams named before doing my picks or just carry on closing my eyes and using a pin.

                                    SouthernMannS Offline
                                    SouthernMannS Offline
                                    SouthernMann
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #441

                                    @Dan54 said in Super Rugby 2025:

                                    What night are teams named? I thought there was a day that all teams needed to be named this year??
                                    Wondering if in future weeks I should wait until teams named before doing my picks or just carry on closing my eyes and using a pin.

                                    Is probably tomorrow at about 4 PM

                                    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • SouthernMannS SouthernMann

                                      @Dan54 said in Super Rugby 2025:

                                      What night are teams named? I thought there was a day that all teams needed to be named this year??
                                      Wondering if in future weeks I should wait until teams named before doing my picks or just carry on closing my eyes and using a pin.

                                      Is probably tomorrow at about 4 PM

                                      Canes4lifeC Online
                                      Canes4lifeC Online
                                      Canes4life
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #442

                                      @SouthernMann said in Super Rugby 2025:

                                      @Dan54 said in Super Rugby 2025:

                                      What night are teams named? I thought there was a day that all teams needed to be named this year??
                                      Wondering if in future weeks I should wait until teams named before doing my picks or just carry on closing my eyes and using a pin.

                                      Is probably tomorrow at about 4 PM

                                      Yeah it was Wednesday afternoons last year. They’ll need to name all the teams at the same time for the Fantasy comp.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • Daffy JaffyD Daffy Jaffy

                                        New law innovations for Super Rugby Pacific in 2025 include:

                                        • Time restrictions (conversions and penalty goals): Players will have 60 seconds to attempt conversions and penalty goals. This was previously 90 seconds for conversions.

                                        • Play on from not-straight lineout throws: If the non-throwing team does not lift a teammate to compete for the ball, then play shall continue. If the non-throwing team lifts a teammate to compete for the ball, a free kick is awarded to the non-throwing team. The awarding of a free kick rather than a scrum is a change to the World Rugby law trial specific to Super Rugby Pacific, to promote the flow of game.

                                        • Protection of 9 at ruck, maul and defensive positions at scrum:

                                        Ruck: A player who is, or was part of the ruck may not play an opponent who is near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.
                                        Maul: A player who is, or was part of the maul may not play an opponent near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.
                                        Scrum: Once play in the scrum begins, the scrum half of the team not in possession takes up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel.

                                        • Starting play in Super Point: The team who scores the first try in regular time has the choice to kick off or receive in Super Point, which was formerly known as Golden Point. This replaces the coin toss.
                                        antipodeanA Online
                                        antipodeanA Online
                                        antipodean
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #443

                                        @Daffy-Jaffy said in Super Rugby 2025:

                                        New law innovations for Super Rugby Pacific in 2025 include:

                                        • Time restrictions (conversions and penalty goals): Players will have 60 seconds to attempt conversions and penalty goals. This was previously 90 seconds for conversions.

                                        • Play on from not-straight lineout throws: If the non-throwing team does not lift a teammate to compete for the ball, then play shall continue. If the non-throwing team lifts a teammate to compete for the ball, a free kick is awarded to the non-throwing team. The awarding of a free kick rather than a scrum is a change to the World Rugby law trial specific to Super Rugby Pacific, to promote the flow of game.

                                        I like the first bit, not the second. Scrums must remain in the game, otherwise you're trending towards a specific athlete.

                                        But if you choose not to compete, whining about not straight throws is pathetic.

                                        • Protection of 9 at ruck, maul and defensive positions at scrum:

                                        Ruck: A player who is, or was part of the ruck may not play an opponent who is near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.

                                        How do you know they're attempting to play the ball? Why is someone who grabs towards the ball in a panic as you come steaming through the ruck protected? What's the point in counter-rucking if some midget can violate law 15.11 and there's naught you can do about it?

                                        Maul: A player who is, or was part of the maul may not play an opponent near it (within one metre), and who is attempting to play the ball away.

                                        As above.

                                        Scrum: Once play in the scrum begins, the scrum half of the team not in possession takes up a position with both feet no further than the centre line of the tunnel.

                                        Again, stupid.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                          Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                          Daffy Jaffy
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #444

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search