Boks v Wobblies I

[pakman]

Howard was extremely well regarded by Leicester.

[nostrildamus]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Boks are beatable. Main strike weapon will be maul.

this post actually aged very well.

[Frank]

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

[antipodean]

@Frank said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

Enthusiastic but limited?

[nostrildamus]

@Frank said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Harry Wilson is the kind of 8 we need.

He's a hardworking, eager, blunt weapon that can be very effective when coached in the right direction. Which seems to be happening at the moment.

[NTA]

Great feet and pace. Won't run through many brick walls but won't stop trying. He burned a few smaller men for pace on the weekend.

Which makes me wonder if the Boks were putting in 100%.

[pakman]

Hanse Cronje?

[barbarian]

His support play is so underrated. Scores way more tries than he should, just by reading the play and being in the right place at the right time.

[pakman]

https://www.rugbypass.com/plus/is-tony-brown-leading-south-africa-down-the-wrong-path/

[NTA]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Hanse Cronje?

@barbarian said in Boks v Wobblies I:

His support play is so underrated. Scores way more tries than he should, just by reading the play and being in the right place at the right time.

I got confused for a minute

[pakman]

https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/2025/08/22/matt-williams-the-wallabies-have-answered-insults-and-pettiness-in-the-only-way-possible/

[pakman]

@pakman said in Boks v Wobblies I:

Howard was extremely well regarded by Leicester.