Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Olympics Thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
olympics
6.3k Posts 141 Posters 953.7k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

    V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #6223

    @MiketheSnow said in Olympics Thread:

    This guy had a tragic life really, those 2 Golds were stripped from him after it was discovered he played semi professional Baseball.
    It wasnt until 30 years after his death that that decision was reversed.

    From the sounds of it he was an extraordinary athlete.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Thorpe

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • MiketheSnowM Offline
      MiketheSnowM Offline
      MiketheSnow
      wrote on last edited by
      #6224

      3172CD34-E028-405E-8596-E94DD613D426.jpeg

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • barbarianB barbarian

        @booboo said in Olympics Thread:

        @sparky said in Olympics Thread:

        After Melbourne bailing on hosting the Commonwealth Games, is there a chance that Brisbane will do the same on hosting the 2032 Olympic Games?

        Are local politicians and Brisbane residents behind what it a massive undertaking?

        Doesn't seem to generating much excitement

        Neither did Sydney during the mid-90s in the lead-up to the games. Like Brisbane the focus was on cost, bureaucratic bungles, impact on residents etc etc etc

        And then the flame was lit and everything was forgotten.

        I expect the same will happen with Brisbane.

        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT Crusader
        wrote on last edited by
        #6225

        @barbarian said in Olympics Thread:

        @booboo said in Olympics Thread:

        @sparky said in Olympics Thread:

        After Melbourne bailing on hosting the Commonwealth Games, is there a chance that Brisbane will do the same on hosting the 2032 Olympic Games?

        Are local politicians and Brisbane residents behind what it a massive undertaking?

        Doesn't seem to generating much excitement

        Neither did Sydney during the mid-90s in the lead-up to the games. Like Brisbane the focus was on cost, bureaucratic bungles, impact on residents etc etc etc

        And then the flame was lit and everything was forgotten.

        I expect the same will happen with Brisbane.

        I recall quite a bit of excitement in Melbourne during the late 90s for the Sydney Games. Lots of promotion, volunteer call outs, trips being planned.

        About the only time in all y time in Oz that Melburnians were all in on something in Sydney…

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MiketheSnowM Offline
          MiketheSnowM Offline
          MiketheSnow
          wrote on last edited by
          #6226

          Seth Godin today

          399330be-144e-4e0c-ae5e-2493469ca2ce-image.png

          https://seths.blog/2024/08/the-paradox-of-lottery-thinking/

          And the poll he references

          Amazing

          https://yougov.co.uk/sport/articles/50301-a-quarter-of-britons-think-they-could-qualify-for-the-2028-olympics

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • KiwiPieK Offline
            KiwiPieK Offline
            KiwiPie
            wrote on last edited by
            #6227

            I saw those results - the highest ranking sports were the ones perceived to involve the least athleticism. Shooting, archery and then at 10%, table tennis and badminton. Having played badminton to a decent level when I was younger, I can guarantee that the 10% who believe they could qualify for the Olympics have never played it. The Olympians are impossibly good, I've played against guys who made national squads when they were younger and they strolled around making me run to all corners - I didn't get a single point unless they messed around.

            mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

              I saw those results - the highest ranking sports were the ones perceived to involve the least athleticism. Shooting, archery and then at 10%, table tennis and badminton. Having played badminton to a decent level when I was younger, I can guarantee that the 10% who believe they could qualify for the Olympics have never played it. The Olympians are impossibly good, I've played against guys who made national squads when they were younger and they strolled around making me run to all corners - I didn't get a single point unless they messed around.

              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #6228

              @KiwiPie said in Olympics Thread:

              I saw those results - the highest ranking sports were the ones perceived to involve the least athleticism. Shooting, archery and then at 10%, table tennis and badminton. Having played badminton to a decent level when I was younger, I can guarantee that the 10% who believe they could qualify for the Olympics have never played it. The Olympians are impossibly good, I've played against guys who made national squads when they were younger and they strolled around making me run to all corners - I didn't get a single point unless they messed around.

              oh god same! i was a decent jnr at our club, went to my first tournament against real decent players, and i distinctly remember the "coach" offering to by me something if i could even get a point off this girl. I did not.

              That stat simply cannot be right, people can not be this stupid.

              KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • DonsteppaD Offline
                DonsteppaD Offline
                Donsteppa
                wrote on last edited by
                #6229

                The archers are insanely accurate too for what's involved.

                ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                  @KiwiPie said in Olympics Thread:

                  I saw those results - the highest ranking sports were the ones perceived to involve the least athleticism. Shooting, archery and then at 10%, table tennis and badminton. Having played badminton to a decent level when I was younger, I can guarantee that the 10% who believe they could qualify for the Olympics have never played it. The Olympians are impossibly good, I've played against guys who made national squads when they were younger and they strolled around making me run to all corners - I didn't get a single point unless they messed around.

                  oh god same! i was a decent jnr at our club, went to my first tournament against real decent players, and i distinctly remember the "coach" offering to by me something if i could even get a point off this girl. I did not.

                  That stat simply cannot be right, people can not be this stupid.

                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #6230

                  @mariner4life said in Olympics Thread:

                  @KiwiPie said in Olympics Thread:

                  I saw those results - the highest ranking sports were the ones perceived to involve the least athleticism. Shooting, archery and then at 10%, table tennis and badminton. Having played badminton to a decent level when I was younger, I can guarantee that the 10% who believe they could qualify for the Olympics have never played it. The Olympians are impossibly good, I've played against guys who made national squads when they were younger and they strolled around making me run to all corners - I didn't get a single point unless they messed around.

                  oh god same! i was a decent jnr at our club, went to my first tournament against real decent players, and i distinctly remember the "coach" offering to by me something if i could even get a point off this girl. I did not.

                  That stat simply cannot be right, people can not be this stupid.

                  When I was 17, I was the best under 18 singles player in our small English town (maybe the 5th best in the county of Shropshire). There was an under 18 match between West Midlands (Birmingham etc) and Leinster of Ireland in our town and I was called in as a late sub for West Midlands when someone got injured. So embarrassing, I think I only played doubles but lost every game around 15-5 as all the 3 other players on the court were so much better than me.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    reprobate
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #6231

                    4 years is fucken ages. I'd waste that swede in the pole vault, then bang his girlfriend.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    9
                    • mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #6232

                      i would love to say i would just transition to being a woman and enter those events

                      but

                      have you seen their fucking running times? I would be the real life equivalent of when Cartman entered the special olympics and got smoked.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                        The archers are insanely accurate too for what's involved.

                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                        ACT Crusader
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #6233

                        @Donsteppa said in Olympics Thread:

                        The archers are insanely accurate too for what's involved.

                        Met a couple of Aussie archers who competed in the national championships here and were trying to crack the Aussie team. The mental and physical ability was pretty amazing. Their physical training is focused on knowing how to calm their heart rate and control certain muscles to steady their body and then perform.

                        Most people can’t sit still for 30 seconds.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • DonsteppaD Offline
                          DonsteppaD Offline
                          Donsteppa
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #6234

                          One notable meme candidate aside, this was how most of the Olympics felt. In the archery where most would fail to consistently hit the target at all "ooooh... only an 8 for that one".

                          450607321_501188918982253_4978644676249412295_n.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • KiwiPieK Offline
                            KiwiPieK Offline
                            KiwiPie
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #6235

                            In the men's 800m final, I was all "have none of these guys got a fast finish?" then realised the winner and runner-up had run the 3rd and 4th fastest times ever.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4lifeM Offline
                              mariner4life
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #6236

                              Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                              The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                              And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                              Canes4lifeC MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                Canes4lifeC Offline
                                Canes4lifeC Offline
                                Canes4life
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #6237

                                @mariner4life said in Olympics Thread:

                                Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                I saw a social post on this and was amazed at how far the target actually was. It's definitely quite deceiving when watching on TV.

                                canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                                  @mariner4life said in Olympics Thread:

                                  Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                  The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                  And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                  I saw a social post on this and was amazed at how far the target actually was. It's definitely quite deceiving when watching on TV.

                                  canefanC Online
                                  canefanC Online
                                  canefan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #6238

                                  @Canes4life said in Olympics Thread:

                                  @mariner4life said in Olympics Thread:

                                  Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                  The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                  And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                  I saw a social post on this and was amazed at how far the target actually was. It's definitely quite deceiving when watching on TV.

                                  Whereas the shooting targets look really small and close

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • DonsteppaD Offline
                                    DonsteppaD Offline
                                    Donsteppa
                                    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
                                    #6239

                                    Among the most brutal is when something like the marathon ends in a sprint finish. The men's race wasn't close this time, but seeing the women effectively have to kick on and then sprint it out among five of them over the last 2-3kms... sheesh.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • CyclopsC Offline
                                      CyclopsC Offline
                                      Cyclops
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #6240

                                      Reminds me of that video of Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce running the parents race at her kids school day winning a 100m sprint by about 50m. Apparently she wasn't going to run until her husband did poorly in the dad's race and one of the other mum's did some trash talking.

                                      I always love watching the decathlon, since they're generally pretty far off the pace of the specialists and even their times/distances are amazing.

                                      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                        Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                        The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                        And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                        MN5M Offline
                                        MN5M Offline
                                        MN5
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #6241

                                        @mariner4life said in Olympics Thread:

                                        Archery on TV is made to look easy by the camera. It's a close up of the archer, and then cut instantly to the arrow thudding in to the target. It looks like it is 10m

                                        The distance is either 50 or 70m. And if you watch that arrow for it's full flight, they aim way the fuck up and it arcs. It's frankly incredible.
                                        And has anyone ever tried to pull even one of those even one of those modern bows?

                                        They always get that wrong in medieval movies/tv shows. You know when the baddies are about to storm the castle and the good guys have the bows drawn back ready ? I’m pretty decent at chin ups/pull ups but to hold a bow like that for ANY length of time is fucken hard work

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • CyclopsC Cyclops

                                          Reminds me of that video of Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce running the parents race at her kids school day winning a 100m sprint by about 50m. Apparently she wasn't going to run until her husband did poorly in the dad's race and one of the other mum's did some trash talking.

                                          I always love watching the decathlon, since they're generally pretty far off the pace of the specialists and even their times/distances are amazing.

                                          MN5M Offline
                                          MN5M Offline
                                          MN5
                                          wrote on last edited by MN5
                                          #6242

                                          @Cyclops said in Olympics Thread:

                                          Reminds me of that video of Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce running the parents race at her kids school day winning a 100m sprint by about 50m. Apparently she wasn't going to run until her husband did poorly in the dad's race and one of the other mum's did some trash talking.

                                          > I always love watching the decathlon, since they're generally pretty far off the pace of the specialists and even their times/distances are amazing.

                                          An argument could be made for them being the best all round athletes at the game I reckon given all the disciplines that they are so good in. The fact this chick won an Olympic gold in the men’s event just illustrates what a crazy world we live in.

                                          IMG_1868.jpeg

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search