Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

B&I Lions 2017

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
britishlionsallblacks
1.0k Posts 77 Posters 164.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #560

    I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

    Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

    CatograndeC D BonesB Chester DrawsC MiketheSnowM 5 Replies Last reply
    1
    • MN5M MN5

      I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

      Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

      CatograndeC Offline
      CatograndeC Offline
      Catogrande
      wrote on last edited by Catogrande
      #561

      @MN5 Genuine question. How many Scots do you think have been hard done by?

      I honestly can't name too many.

      W P Nel - dunno how his injury situation is though - cough, Warburton, cough.
      Gray bros - Lock is a position of strength and I think they've suffered the backlash of the England match.
      Russell - I would have taken him over Biggar and would have it a close call between him and Ford.

      Anyone else?

      MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • CatograndeC Catogrande

        @MN5 Genuine question. How many Scots do you think have been hard done by?

        I honestly can't name too many.

        W P Nel - dunno how his injury situation is though - cough, Warburton, cough.
        Gray bros - Lock is a position of strength and I think they've suffered the backlash of the England match.
        Russell - I would have taken him over Biggar and would have it a close call between him and Ford.

        Anyone else?

        MN5M Offline
        MN5M Offline
        MN5
        wrote on last edited by MN5
        #562

        @Catogrande said in B&I Lions 2017:

        @MN5 Genuine question. How many Scots do you think have been hard done by?

        I honestly can't name too many.

        W P Nel - dunno how his injury situation is though - cough, Warburton, cough.
        Gray bros - Lock is a position of strength and I think they've suffered the backlash of the England match.
        Russell - I would have taken him over Biggar and would have it a close call between him and Ford.

        Anyone else?

        Watson, Laidlaw and Dunbar were probably names mentioned. Even Visser.

        I reckon 6-7 woulda been realistic. They beat both Ireland and Wales this year afterall.

        All the butthurt fans are thrilled in one sense though cos it means the squad to Australia will be strong.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrucialC Offline
          CrucialC Offline
          Crucial
          wrote on last edited by
          #563

          I reckon Dunbar could make a very good centre partnership with Joseph as much as there are other good players in the mix.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MN5M MN5

            I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

            Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Derm McCrum
            wrote on last edited by Derm McCrum
            #564

            @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

            I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

            Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

            Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

            I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

            MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Derm McCrum

              @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

              I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

              Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

              Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

              I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

              MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by
              #565

              @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

              @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

              I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

              Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

              Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

              I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

              I think that would more than suffice . 8-10 is fantasy stuff....

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • MN5M MN5

                @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

                @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

                I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

                I think that would more than suffice . 8-10 is fantasy stuff....

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Derm McCrum
                wrote on last edited by
                #566

                @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

                @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

                I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

                I think that would more than suffice . 8-10 is fantasy stuff....

                Fair enough, so who gets dropped to make way from the selection today?

                Laidlaw for Youngs/Webb?
                Nel for Sinckler?
                Dunbar for Davies?
                Russell for Biggar?
                Maitland ??
                Gray for Henderson?
                Watson for ??

                MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Derm McCrum

                  @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                  Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                  Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

                  I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

                  I think that would more than suffice . 8-10 is fantasy stuff....

                  Fair enough, so who gets dropped to make way from the selection today?

                  Laidlaw for Youngs/Webb?
                  Nel for Sinckler?
                  Dunbar for Davies?
                  Russell for Biggar?
                  Maitland ??
                  Gray for Henderson?
                  Watson for ??

                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #567

                  @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  @Pot-Hale said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                  I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                  Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                  Because Scotland haven't provided many players to the side over the last number of tours. That feeds into prejudice in selectors' minds. The coaching team is made up of Welsh and English coaches which creates an inevitable bias towards the players they know (and think can resurrect themselves) as opposed to ones they don't Gray Bros, Dunbar, Maitland, Watson, Jones, etc.

                  I'm curious if Laidlaw and Nel were available and were selected today, along with Hogg and Seymour and say Maitland and Dunbar, would that have been enough? Or was there a wider expectation of say 8-10 places?

                  I think that would more than suffice . 8-10 is fantasy stuff....

                  Fair enough, so who gets dropped to make way from the selection today?

                  Laidlaw for Youngs/Webb?
                  Nel for Sinckler?
                  Dunbar for Davies?
                  Russell for Biggar?
                  Maitland ??
                  Gray for Henderson?
                  Watson for ??

                  That looks completely realistic. Throw Sean Lamont in for a swansong too 🙂

                  There's obviously gonna be a heap of 50/50 calls and it's hard to see the Scots getting any benefit from those.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MN5M MN5

                    I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                    Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                    BonesB Offline
                    BonesB Offline
                    Bones
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #568

                    @MN5 not sure I can buy into a precious moan from someone who probably watched about 5 minutes of 6N rugby....

                    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • BonesB Bones

                      @MN5 not sure I can buy into a precious moan from someone who probably watched about 5 minutes of 6N rugby....

                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #569

                      @Bones said in B&I Lions 2017:

                      @MN5 not sure I can buy into a precious moan from someone who probably watched about 5 minutes of 6N rugby....

                      5 minutes is being generous, however if rugby writers can get paid for watching about the same amount I reserve my right to be outraged and appalled on an internet forum.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                        taniwharugby
                        wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                        #570

                        in the interest of fairness and political correctness, each nation should have provided and equal number of players, and then given certificates to the ones that would have gone if not for being overlooked in the name of fairness.

                        I also thnk the Lions should play Payne in the game in Whangarei to make local fans happy, what say you @Stargazer 🎣

                        @MN5 which rugby writers get paid to watch 5 minutes?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • MN5M Offline
                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5
                          wrote on last edited by MN5
                          #571

                          Scots nearly snuck three players onto the plane before Gatland realised Huw Jones wasnt actually Welsh and didn't pick him.

                          0_1492640622670_FB_IMG_1492640521861.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • BovidaeB Bovidae

                            @antipodean 2 Jocks.

                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodean
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #572

                            @Bovidae said in B&I Lions 2017:

                            @antipodean 2 Jocks.

                            @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                            @antipodean said in B&I Lions 2017:

                            Predictable squad.

                            A mercenary and only one Scot.

                            Two

                            Well then, I don't know what they're complaining about.

                            @raznomore said in B&I Lions 2017:

                            Is Hartley hard done by or actually too shit for selection?

                            I'd say he's hard done by. I don't think they could select a better set piece hooker.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • MN5M MN5

                              I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                              Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                              Chester DrawsC Offline
                              Chester DrawsC Offline
                              Chester Draws
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #573

                              @MN5 said in B&I Lions 2017:

                              I wouldn't mind if someone could give me a logical answer as to why one country ranked 5th provides just two players and another ranked 8th provides twelve.

                              Because rankings don't tell much at all -- a couple of wins and they've shot up.There is one person who has made Scotland much better -- Vern Cotter. The players haven't got that much better suddenly.

                              You should treasure Scotland's current ranking now, because in a few years it could be much worse. If I was ranking on long-term ability, Scotland would be 10th. Which is where they usually dwell, come to think of it.

                              Now i know how Highlanders fans felt in 2015 when none of their forwards became ABs

                              And how's that Highlander's pack looking now? How many of them would be current ABs?

                              The AB selectors didn't overlook the Highlanders in 2015 any more they overlooked the red-hot Chiefs after their first Super Championship. Slowly -- because the Chiefs kept winning -- players started to make the ABs. Some things need distance to be seen properly.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Number 10N Offline
                                Number 10N Offline
                                Number 10
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #574

                                Speaking of rankings, I presume as the B&I Lions do not have a ranking, and are not a country, then the AB's will not lose or gain any ranking points for any wins or losses in the series?

                                boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • BovidaeB Offline
                                  BovidaeB Offline
                                  Bovidae
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #575

                                  The Scots have likely paid for not having anyone representing them in the coaching staff to push their claims for selection. Gregor Townsend turned down that opportunity. If selection came down to 2 players they will go with the players they know.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
                                    Rancid Schnitzel
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #576

                                    Is Laidlaw injured? Surely he'd be one of the 3 best 9s?

                                    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

                                      Is Laidlaw injured? Surely he'd be one of the 3 best 9s?

                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #577

                                      @Rancid-Schnitzel said in B&I Lions 2017:

                                      Is Laidlaw injured? Surely he'd be one of the 3 best 9s?

                                      He was injured during the 6N. No idea if he still is.

                                      Murray looks to be uncertain due to nerve injury.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Disgusted of TW
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #578

                                        You could probably make a case for Laidlaw as 3rd SH and a possible midweek captain, but he does not present a running threat, unlike the three guys chosen.

                                        MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          Tregaskis
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #579

                                          Discrimination against Scots? All I can see is a massive and undeniable bias towards cisgendered men.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          5
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search