Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Sevu Reece - in trouble again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblackscrusaders
75 Posts 36 Posters 2.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JetJ Offline
    JetJ Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Imagine having a coconut that big and for it to be completely empty between your ears.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • BonesB Bones

      So...ummmm... just what did EdG do then?

      No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

      ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT Crusader
      wrote on last edited by
      #44

      @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

      No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

      Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

      BonesB JetJ 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

        @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

        No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

        Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

        BonesB Offline
        BonesB Offline
        Bones
        wrote on last edited by
        #45

        @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

        @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

        No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

        Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

        Don't you bring the highlanders into this...

        ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • BonesB Bones

          @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

          @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

          No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

          Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

          Don't you bring the highlanders into this...

          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT CrusaderA Offline
          ACT Crusader
          wrote on last edited by
          #46

          @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

          @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

          @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

          No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

          Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

          Don't you bring the highlanders into this...

          I didn’t mention Jimmy Cowan but come to think of it 😉

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

            @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

            No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

            Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

            JetJ Offline
            JetJ Offline
            Jet
            wrote on last edited by
            #47

            @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

            @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

            No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

            Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

            whats the story here?

            was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

            ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • BonesB Bones

              @Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

              To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
              But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
              Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.

              I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?

              KruseK Offline
              KruseK Offline
              Kruse
              wrote on last edited by
              #48

              @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

              @Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

              To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
              But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
              Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.

              I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?

              My reading of it was that he'd been trying to de-escalate a situation between her and others, and had tried to get her to sit down, initially by sitting down himself, then eventually physically pulling her down to sit with him.
              The kind of action which a particularly nasty prosecution lawyer of the american kind could force a witness into describing as "pulling her to the ground" and "dragging".
              I might have it wrong though - and the fact there is this second incident... yeah, I'm wondering if I was overly optimistic in the first place.

              Billy TellB WillieTheWaiterW 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • KruseK Kruse

                @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                @Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
                But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
                Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.

                I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?

                My reading of it was that he'd been trying to de-escalate a situation between her and others, and had tried to get her to sit down, initially by sitting down himself, then eventually physically pulling her down to sit with him.
                The kind of action which a particularly nasty prosecution lawyer of the american kind could force a witness into describing as "pulling her to the ground" and "dragging".
                I might have it wrong though - and the fact there is this second incident... yeah, I'm wondering if I was overly optimistic in the first place.

                Billy TellB Offline
                Billy TellB Offline
                Billy Tell
                wrote on last edited by
                #49

                @Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                @Kruse said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                To be fair, after reading the details of Sevu's first "incident" - and reading between the lines of the witness reports - I had some sympathy. It seemed quite possibly an innocuous incident, but branded with "domestic violence" and therefore pitchforks out.
                But a second incident... not sure I can be bothered reading the details of this one, but one way or the other, he hasn't learned lessons.
                Plus he's slower than me, so get him out of the All Blacks anyway.

                I thought he'd knocked/tackled her to the ground and dragged her? The injuries don't sound very innocuous, have I completely misunderstood the meaning of that word?

                My reading of it was that he'd been trying to de-escalate a situation between her and others, and had tried to get her to sit down, initially by sitting down himself, then eventually physically pulling her down to sit with him.
                The kind of action which a particularly nasty prosecution lawyer of the american kind could force a witness into describing as "pulling her to the ground" and "dragging".
                I might have it wrong though - and the fact there is this second incident... yeah, I'm wondering if I was overly optimistic in the first place.

                So what you’re saying is that it was a collapsed brawl?

                1 Reply Last reply
                9
                • sparkyS Offline
                  sparkyS Offline
                  sparky
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #50

                  No dickheads means no dickheads.

                  boobooB JetJ 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • sparkyS sparky

                    No dickheads means no dickheads.

                    boobooB Do not disturb
                    boobooB Do not disturb
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #51

                    @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                    No dickheads means no dickheads.

                    From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                    I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                    VirgilV SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • boobooB booboo

                      @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                      No dickheads means no dickheads.

                      From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                      I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                      VirgilV Offline
                      VirgilV Offline
                      Virgil
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #52

                      @booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                      @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                      No dickheads means no dickheads.

                      From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                      I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                      Found this..

                      https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/02/07/no-dickheads-at-chelsea-epl-club-hires-all-blacks-guru-enoka/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • boobooB booboo

                        @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                        No dickheads means no dickheads.

                        From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                        I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                        SnowyS Offline
                        SnowyS Offline
                        Snowy
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #53

                        @booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                        @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                        No dickheads means no dickheads.

                        From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                        I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                        The Breakers CEO said it about their hiring policy, think it just got “transferred” to ABs.

                        boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • SnowyS Snowy

                          @booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                          @sparky said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                          No dickheads means no dickheads.

                          From where does this "no dickheads" policy originate?

                          I recall "better people make better All Blacks". Some difference in that.

                          The Breakers CEO said it about their hiring policy, think it just got “transferred” to ABs.

                          boobooB Do not disturb
                          boobooB Do not disturb
                          booboo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #54

                          @Snowy it's talked a lot in Aussie sport, especially with reference to specific clubs.

                          I just wondered if it had been conflated. Although @Virgil 's post suggest some basis for applying to the ABs.

                          VirgilV 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • boobooB booboo

                            @Snowy it's talked a lot in Aussie sport, especially with reference to specific clubs.

                            I just wondered if it had been conflated. Although @Virgil 's post suggest some basis for applying to the ABs.

                            VirgilV Offline
                            VirgilV Offline
                            Virgil
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #55

                            @booboo said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                            @Snowy it's talked a lot in Aussie sport, especially with reference to specific clubs.

                            I just wondered if it had been conflated. Although @Virgil 's post suggest some basis for applying to the ABs.

                            pretty sure its a mantra in most NZ sports sides
                            Could be wrong but im sure its been mentioned with the Black Caps as well.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • frugbyF Offline
                              frugbyF Offline
                              frugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #56

                              Just sack the fluffybunny. Shit bloke. Shit rugby player. An easy excuse for NZR to send him offshore, fucken use it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • JetJ Jet

                                @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

                                Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

                                whats the story here?

                                was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #57

                                @Jet said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

                                Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

                                whats the story here?

                                was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

                                Charged with assault on a female in 08 or 09 if I recall. Jimmy Cowan got charged with a couple of things around the same time.

                                NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @Jet said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

                                  Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

                                  whats the story here?

                                  was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

                                  Charged with assault on a female in 08 or 09 if I recall. Jimmy Cowan got charged with a couple of things around the same time.

                                  NepiaN Online
                                  NepiaN Online
                                  Nepia
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #58

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  @Jet said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                  No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

                                  Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

                                  whats the story here?

                                  was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

                                  Charged with assault on a female in 08 or 09 if I recall. Jimmy Cowan got charged with a couple of things around the same time.

                                  Thomson was charged but not convicted as his partner admitted she'd blown it all out of proportion - it happened in Havelock North and pretty much everyone knew there was nothing there but the police had to proceed due to the accusation. (One of the cops who attended is a friend of mine).

                                  KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  12
                                  • NepiaN Nepia

                                    @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                    @Jet said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                    @ACT-Crusader said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                    @Bones said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                    No dickheads policy erased, starting with the coach.

                                    Nah that went out the window when Adam Thomson kept getting selected….

                                    whats the story here?

                                    was he trouble? Cant say I recall him being a douchebag bar the John Cena celebration.

                                    Charged with assault on a female in 08 or 09 if I recall. Jimmy Cowan got charged with a couple of things around the same time.

                                    Thomson was charged but not convicted as his partner admitted she'd blown it all out of proportion - it happened in Havelock North and pretty much everyone knew there was nothing there but the police had to proceed due to the accusation. (One of the cops who attended is a friend of mine).

                                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                                    Kiwiwomble
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #59

                                    @Nepia i just looked it up and apparently she was saying (maybe changed her story?) there was nothing in it and they'd just had an argument and it was a third party/witness that call the cops and was claiming they saw assult

                                    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                      @Nepia i just looked it up and apparently she was saying (maybe changed her story?) there was nothing in it and they'd just had an argument and it was a third party/witness that call the cops and was claiming they saw assult

                                      NepiaN Online
                                      NepiaN Online
                                      Nepia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #60

                                      @Kiwiwomble said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                      @Nepia i just looked it up and apparently she was saying (maybe changed her story?) there was nothing in it and they'd just had an argument and it was a third party/witness that call the cops and was claiming they saw assult

                                      IIRC the witness said it wasn't assault.

                                      KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • NepiaN Nepia

                                        @Kiwiwomble said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                        @Nepia i just looked it up and apparently she was saying (maybe changed her story?) there was nothing in it and they'd just had an argument and it was a third party/witness that call the cops and was claiming they saw assult

                                        IIRC the witness said it wasn't assault.

                                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                                        Kiwiwomble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #61

                                        @Nepia said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                        @Kiwiwomble said in Sevu Reece - in trouble again:

                                        @Nepia i just looked it up and apparently she was saying (maybe changed her story?) there was nothing in it and they'd just had an argument and it was a third party/witness that call the cops and was claiming they saw assult

                                        IIRC the witness said it wasn't assault.

                                        the NZ Herald

                                        The former TV presenter who was allegedly assaulted by her All Black boyfriend has claimed the rugby player didn't touch her - that they just had a heated verbal argument.

                                        "He's a sweetheart who'd never hurt a fly," she told a friend.
                                        Holley is believed to have told police that the incident was a storm in a teacup, but police are understood to have a statement from one eyewitness that says otherwise.

                                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Landers92L Offline
                                          Landers92L Offline
                                          Landers92
                                          wrote on last edited by Landers92
                                          #62

                                          To be thrown a lifeline by NZR and the Crusaders and to then do that and throw it back in their face is something else. Keep in mind Razor was the coach that wanted to give him a chance back then too. Really hope we never see him in the AB jersey again, embarrassing he was even an AB this year with it hanging over his head. You can’t tell me management didn’t know about it…

                                          I saw him at the Christchurch cup day(the night this happened) and he was absolutely munted, not a care in the world for how he was carrying on. Just a bad look all round. Should 100% be charged, everyone else would.

                                          African MonkeyA B 2 Replies Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search