Crusaders v Blues
-
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@Steven-Harris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiInLondon
..beggars belief
The crazy thing is if there was only 3 points in this I would bet dollars to doughnuts they would be taking the shotHow is that crazy? Down 3 vs down 12 is totally different
Blues have effectively dug their own grave though. Just needed to stay in touch in these conditions... they have not looked like scoring a try all night. Crusaders will always give enough penalties to stay in the game. Now they are forced to chase the game.
-
Finally they work out getting one of your better ball carriers up against a thinly defended area
-
@Darth-Sader said in Crusaders v Blues:
Blues not accumulating points when on offer and drifting out of touch
Blues have accumulated 7 and are now well in touch.
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
but they should have taken the 3.....
Everyone does that from a free kick. Duh
-
@frugby said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@Steven-Harris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiInLondon
..beggars belief
The crazy thing is if there was only 3 points in this I would bet dollars to doughnuts they would be taking the shotHow is that crazy? Down 3 vs down 12 is totally different
Blues have effectively dug their own grave though. Just needed to stay in touch in these conditions... they have not looked like scoring a try all night. Crusaders will always give enough penalties to stay in the game. Now they are forced to chase the game.
They have been down 7 to start the game
Then down 7 at halftime
Then down 12 early second half
They need tries
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
but they should have taken the 3.....
And they could be in front if they took all their opportunities. 2 tries for all that possession and territory is woeful. They blues are tactically incompetent
-
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@frugby said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
@Steven-Harris said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiInLondon
..beggars belief
The crazy thing is if there was only 3 points in this I would bet dollars to doughnuts they would be taking the shotHow is that crazy? Down 3 vs down 12 is totally different
Blues have effectively dug their own grave though. Just needed to stay in touch in these conditions... they have not looked like scoring a try all night. Crusaders will always give enough penalties to stay in the game. Now they are forced to chase the game.
They have been down 7 to start the game
Then down 7 at halftime
Then down 12 early second half
They need tries
The Blues might win this, but I think the percentage option earlier when they were down by 7 was to take the three. Chasing the game away from home against the team currently top doesn't generally work.
-
@Bones said in Crusaders v Blues:
What's with the commentary volume dipping significantly at every restart?
Nisbo’s getting old
-
@KiwiInLondon said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
but they should have taken the 3.....
And they could be in front if they took all their opportunities. 2 tries for all that possession and territory is woeful. They blues are tactically incompetent
Sliding doors is a decent movie.
-
@KiwiInLondon said in Crusaders v Blues:
@KiwiMurph said in Crusaders v Blues:
but they should have taken the 3.....
And they could be in front if they took all their opportunities. 2 tries for all that possession and territory is woeful. They blues are tactically incompetent
It's not tactical incompetence it's average attack and poor execution
