• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks vs Pumas I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksargentina
108 Posts 20 Posters 891 Views
Springboks vs Pumas I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    wrote last edited by
    #98

    I always thought the ball had to travel at least 5m from the tryline kick out. The ref made the game a lot stop start in that 1st half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to OomPB last edited by
    #99

    @OomPB said in Springboks vs Pumas I:

    @Billy-Webb the Pumas had that Kolbey gift of a try. The Bok defense was very good against the All Blacks. No worry for myself. Our lineouts was much better, Etsebeth had for a change a good game.

    It wasn’t really tested as much as people think given ABs either couldn’t catch or were kicking good ball away.

    Sliding doors moment was the Kolbe intercept. Boks were under the pump at that point

    OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    replied to stodders last edited by
    #100

    @stodders I dont agree. The Boks actually dominate that first period.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to OomPB last edited by
    #101

    @OomPB said in Springboks vs Pumas I:

    @stodders I dont agree. The Boks actually dominate that first period.

    At that specific moment, the ABs were in the midst of a purple patch. They had scored a try, had butchered an opportunity when DMac kicked and had a 3 on 1 when Kolbe made his intervention. Passes were sticking and the Bok defence was under the pump.

    I wasn’t talking about the half as a whole, more that if Kolbe hadn’t intercepted, it would have been 14-0 with ABs ascendant. As was shown the previous week, the Boks didn’t handle the scoreboard pressure that well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote last edited by
    #102

    Huge difference between a Pollard/Dda/Kriel backline chasing down a score or a Wellington or Durbs backline.

    I’m still not sold on Reinach/Manie/Willemse’s ability to embrace pressure (scoreboard or otherwise) but you don’t want to engage in a shootout with them. They can ball.

    OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • OomPBO Offline
    OomPBO Offline
    OomPB
    replied to Smuts last edited by
    #103

    @Smuts Reinach frustrate me. When you have a 10 dominating as SMZ , you just give him possession as much and as quick as possible. (coming from a Stormers supporter). SMZ have been waiting patiently at the Stormers behind Libbok.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    wrote last edited by
    #104

    Me too Oom. Can’t wait for the Pead era to start.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PNP Offline
    PNP Offline
    PN
    wrote last edited by PN
    #105
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to Smuts last edited by
    #106

    @Smuts said in Springboks vs Pumas I:

    Me too Oom. Can’t wait for the Pead era to start.

    I thought Grant Williams was currently the best 9 in SA?

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to stodders last edited by
    #107

    @stodders to be honest, I’m not sure who the coaches see as 1-5.

    I’m in the minority (at least in my SA rugby chats), but I’d have Faf, daylight, Williams, Reinach and then a long way back van den Berg.

    Faf is far from a perfect scrummie. But he’s the best ruck rat on earth for my money. A defensive menace who gets better as pressure increases and crucially makes everyone around him better too.

    It’s probably too soon to tell if Williams has that killer instinct but I reckon we know Reinach doesn’t. Which is fine, so long as the coaches keep Reinach bracketed with a mongrel to deal with clusterfucks like Ellis Park, Eden Park or the RWC semi…

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to Smuts last edited by
    #108

    @Smuts said in Springboks vs Pumas I:

    @stodders to be honest, I’m not sure who the coaches see as 1-5.

    I’m in the minority (at least in my SA rugby chats), but I’d have Faf, daylight, Williams, Reinach and then a long way back van den Berg.

    Faf is far from a perfect scrummie. But he’s the best ruck rat on earth for my money. A defensive menace who gets better as pressure increases and crucially makes everyone around him better too.

    It’s probably too soon to tell if Williams has that killer instinct but I reckon we know Reinach doesn’t. Which is fine, so long as the coaches keep Reinach bracketed with a mongrel to deal with clusterfucks like Ellis Park, Eden Park or the RWC semi…

    I hear you on Faf, but I’m not sure the coaches think he’s the 9 Tonyball needs.

    I reckon he still has a chance of making the WC squad, if only to have on the bench with Pollard as the “reverse-choke squad”, tasked with coming on to wrestle back control of the game when Tonyball fails against a team that can catch and tackle near 90%, or the Boks run up against their 2027 Bryce Lawrence

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Springboks vs Pumas I
Rugby Matches
springboksargentina
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.