• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hurricanes v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
hurricanesblues
534 Posts 55 Posters 18.8k Views
Hurricanes v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #499

    I'd like to see someone snot Coles. Then TJ.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to gt12 on last edited by Nepia
    #500

    @gt12 said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    followed by Rieko with 18!

    Not really sure that tackling machine is the best use of Ioane, I'd like to see him back on the wing TBH.

    Also, crazy to have two inexperienced midfielders start together when TJ is available.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #501

    @Nepia

    Me too, but that 18 made illustrates that the three missed weren’t quite as bad as they seem. Personally I think it was probably a good game for his development - getting turned in and out a few times usually helps for midfielders early - unless it becomes what they are known for...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #502

    Just watched the game again and I was actually very happy with how JGB ran the show. Not sure why he's getting so much negativitiy on here, he was very solid without being spectacular and I think that's what the Canes need atm. He cleared well, was strong when running into contact, defended well and his passing wasn't as laboured as some people make out.

    ACT CrusaderA WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #503

    @Canes4life Canes had plenty of go forward and opportunity and they needed a bit of class in their playmaker to take advantage. Defensively he’s not too bad.

    Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #504

    @ACT-Crusader it takes time in the saddle to become a classy player and I think both him and Fletcher Smith are coming along nicely, without setting the house on fire.

    Aslong as they keep improving and come more comfortable barking orders I think we will start to see the best. I wonder if they will continue the rotation and bring in Smith for the next game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to number9 on last edited by
    #505

    @number9 said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @junior said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @number9 said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @Kirwan said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @Stargazer said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    Akira not good at no. 8. Sotutu can't come back soon enough.

    Yawn. He’s cleaned up some messy scrums tonight

    Blues scrum is fine, the delay with Christie and Ioane is terrible.

    Hardly. They’ve been shoved all over the park

    Bullshit! Christie taking his time and Aki is slow when picking up the ball from the back.

    Ball getting caught behind locks' feet. Schoolboy stuff.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #506

    Not much to add.

    Laumape brilliance ended up being decisive.

    Apart from brief spell in 2nd Blue never used powerhouse forwards to punch up centre.

    At 27 - 22 I was shouting to drive, drive, drive, draw a penalty and at 30-22, to quote a line from The Matrix, it would have been, 'Dodge that!'!

    BB seems a shadow of his previous self. Not a great kicking 15.

    And Patty T/Ofa very subdued.

    Couldn't see what was going on in scrum, but thought May stood up well to Ofa, and Hodgman up and down against Lomax.

    Was incandescent when O'Keeffe chose to signal on field decision try at end. I VERY, VERY much doubt he actually saw the ball touch the line, and had he asked the TMO to make the call it would have been no try. The protocol needs some work IMO.

    All that said, Canes ought to have had it won by the 60, and Blues played poorly and only just lost, so no huge need to go back to the drawing board.

    canefanC C 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    trodthesod
    wrote on last edited by
    #507

    As a biased Blues supporter I would rather have seen O’Keefe immediately award a try.There was no immediate raised arm,but an unconvincing call that he had seen the ball on the line.Going to the TMO proved nothing.Before TMOs we would have been happy the ref had seen the try and gone home happy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #508

    @pakman I think he got the top bodies to move and was able to see the Canes player with the ball grounded over the line. No other way to actually see the grounding as it happened

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    trodthesod
    wrote on last edited by
    #509

    A very quaint way to call a try,remove bodies!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #510

    @pakman said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    Not much to add.

    Laumape brilliance ended up being decisive.

    Apart from brief spell in 2nd Blue never used powerhouse forwards to punch up centre.

    At 27 - 22 I was shouting to drive, drive, drive, draw a penalty and at 30-22, to quote a line from The Matrix, it would have been, 'Dodge that!'!

    BB seems a shadow of his previous self. Not a great kicking 15.

    And Patty T/Ofa very subdued.

    Couldn't see what was going on in scrum, but thought May stood up well to Ofa, and Hodgman up and down against Lomax.

    Was incandescent when O'Keeffe chose to signal on field decision try at end. I VERY, VERY much doubt he actually saw the ball touch the line, and had he asked the TMO to make the call it would have been no try. The protocol needs some work IMO.

    All that said, Canes ought to have had it won by the 60, and Blues played poorly and only just lost, so no huge need to go back to the drawing board.

    I haven't seen May on the pitch, he wasn't in the starting 23.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to cgrant on last edited by
    #511

    @cgrant yeah he pulled out before the game - pretty sure it was Armstrong.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Bones on last edited by pakman
    #512

    @Bones said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @cgrant yeah he pulled out before the game - pretty sure it was Armstrong.

    Fair cop. I didn't see lineups and checked on Scrum.com, which said May. Then reading GetStuffed.com I saw Armstrong, and meant to change it.

    Thought he did well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    wrote on last edited by
    #513

    I think Armstrong always does ok, seems to give away a lot less penalties than May.
    Him and Lomax seem to at least hold their own in scrums.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #514

    @Canes4life said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    Just watched the game again and I was actually very happy with how JGB ran the show. Not sure why he's getting so much negativitiy on here, he was very solid without being spectacular and I think that's what the Canes need atm. He cleared well, was strong when running into contact, defended well and his passing wasn't as laboured as some people make out.

    Agree. I had read the criticism before the match so was surprised how well he played. His passing was good in this game. It was a bit labored in his first two starts but not this one. The key though with how rugby is played now is clearing the ball. Its essential now even more so than in the past. And in this respect hes clearly better than Smith

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #515

    I think JGB suffers from preconceived ideas. A couple of games this year I've been surprised at how well he's played when compared to comments.

    A taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #516

    He was OK against the Blues, not brilliant but sound and effective. Ran his backline well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #517

    @Bones He's like Prinsep - an easy target for when things go wrong.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #518

    @African-Monkey said in Hurricanes v Blues:

    @Bones He's like Prinsep - an easy target for when things go wrong.

    It's funny - Blackwell has started playing fairly ordinary and not a patch on his form at the start of the year - yet he now gets less attention.

    WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
    1

Hurricanes v Blues
Rugby Matches
hurricanesblues
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.