Wallabies v Pumas II

[Machpants]

@yeetyaah said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@machpants nice

Ozzie have had some nice tries, but pretty lame game

[Old Samurai Jack]

Hodge is podge.

[Bones]

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

[Duluth]

I want to see the old man Greg Holmes recreate his try from 2006

[antipodean]

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

[Bones]

@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

[Machpants]

Stadium has filled up for the main course

[Bones]

@old-samurai-jack said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

Hodge is podge.

Hodge is the player we wish Bridge could be.

[KiwiMurph]

Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

[antipodean]

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

Yeah but the try was awarded. The disparity you're pointing at I get, but that's a vagary of the law. You'd hate to see everyone YC just because they were last in defence and gave a potential penalty away while still being scored against.

[NTA]

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?

[Bones]

@antipodean who the fuck do you think you are. I would love to see every wallaby carded.

[NTA]

@kiwimurph said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

Wallaby bench pretty average tonight.

Not helped by Petaia breaking. Again.

[L_n_P]

Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

[antipodean]

@l_n_p said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

We made a scrumhalf a fullback/ five-eighth...

[booboo]

@l_n_p said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

Hooper is a cracking player but I wonder if he'd come up through the NZ system if he'd have ended up as an international 12 or 13.

Too small. No kicking game ...

[Bones]

@nta said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@antipodean said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

So if Argentina hadn't scored, surely it's PT and YC? So why does that cancel out the YC?

Jaco said penalty only for the tackle.

Take away that tackler and it's a walk in...

Was a discussion point among refs here for these situations where it is close to the line - how do you stop their forward momentum without going over the shoulder?

I don't really like the reasoning that because I can't stop a player by legal means then I can turn to illegal means. So weak scrums should be allowed to collapse? Defending teams can pull down mauls? Etc

[antipodean]

@bones said in Wallabies v Pumas II:

Jaco is well past it eh.

Worth saying again.

[booboo]

Meh ... might have gone pen try there ... but full time, who cares

[Derpus]

@l_n_p Lions test out that shit to bed.