Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
9.3k Posts 152 Posters 381.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

    @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

    I disagree. Versus Bok 2 we were still in it with 20 minutes to play. Kolbe's intercept was a game changer.
    We needed optimum side as stated above and active captain.

    With a functioning set piece (particularly lineout) that game could and would have been more competitive. I personally think they would still have won but it would have been by a much more respectable score.

    I agree. Holland is such a lineout weapon (and a decent work rate) he has to start.

    nonpartizanN Offline
    nonpartizanN Offline
    nonpartizan
    wrote on last edited by
    #6662

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

    @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

    @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

    I disagree. Versus Bok 2 we were still in it with 20 minutes to play. Kolbe's intercept was a game changer.
    We needed optimum side as stated above and active captain.

    With a functioning set piece (particularly lineout) that game could and would have been more competitive. I personally think they would still have won but it would have been by a much more respectable score.

    I agree. Holland is such a lineout weapon (and a decent work rate) he has to start.

    Yeah, he does so much better as a starter than off the bench. I'm curious to know why he was moved to the bench for the Boks, not that I am criticizing the decision just would like to know why. Admittedly he looked a little weary in Argie II so maybe they wanted to get him some rest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

      I disagree. Versus Bok 2 we were still in it with 20 minutes to play. Kolbe's intercept was a game changer.
      We needed optimum side as stated above and active captain.

      With a functioning set piece (particularly lineout) that game could and would have been more competitive. I personally think they would still have won but it would have been by a much more respectable score.

      I agree. Holland is such a lineout weapon (and a decent work rate) he has to start.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      brodean
      wrote on last edited by
      #6663

      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

      I disagree. Versus Bok 2 we were still in it with 20 minutes to play. Kolbe's intercept was a game changer.
      We needed optimum side as stated above and active captain.

      With a functioning set piece (particularly lineout) that game could and would have been more competitive. I personally think they would still have won but it would have been by a much more respectable score.

      I agree. Holland is such a lineout weapon (and a decent work rate) he has to start.

      The lineout was so much better with Taylor and Holland there and with Scooter missing. Vaai and Tuipulotu are both better lineout callers than Scooter too.

      Holland should be the first lock named and the main 80 minute player. Vaa'i can lose focus if he plays much longer than 60. Paddy, Scooter and Darry can fill in the gaps when they're not injured. I doubt any of those 3 have the bodies now for regular 80 minute test rugby

      nostrildamusN P 2 Replies Last reply
      2
      • sparkyS sparky

        @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

        I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

        nonpartizanN Offline
        nonpartizanN Offline
        nonpartizan
        wrote on last edited by nonpartizan
        #6664

        @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

        @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

        I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

        I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

        HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

        MN5M T nzzpN 3 Replies Last reply
        2
        • nonpartizanN nonpartizan

          @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

          @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

          I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

          I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

          HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

          MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by MN5
          #6665

          @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

          @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

          @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

          I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

          I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

          HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

          I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

          Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" line is lazy and just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

          nonpartizanN 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • MN5M MN5

            @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

            @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

            @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

            I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

            I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

            HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

            I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

            Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" line is lazy and just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

            nonpartizanN Offline
            nonpartizanN Offline
            nonpartizan
            wrote on last edited by
            #6666

            @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

            @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

            @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

            @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

            I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

            I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

            HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

            I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

            Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" is just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

            True. If it all came down to biggest populations India (for example) would be way better at the Olympics across all disciplines. Culture and intellect play a big part of sporting success.

            MN5M B 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • nonpartizanN nonpartizan

              @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

              @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

              @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

              @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

              I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

              I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

              HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

              I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

              Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" is just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

              True. If it all came down to biggest populations India (for example) would be way better at the Olympics across all disciplines. Culture and intellect play a big part of sporting success.

              MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by
              #6667

              @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

              @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

              @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

              @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

              @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

              I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

              I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

              HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

              I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

              Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" is just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

              True. If it all came down to biggest populations India (for example) would be way better at the Olympics across all disciplines. Culture and intellect play a big part of sporting success.

              ......yeah I had a good chat with an Indian dude I know about this very thing and he bemoaned the fact that his nation was so unathletic overall. They're always last in the medal to population table at the Olympics ! and even in Cricket they're not as dominant as they would hope to be......

              Regardless of population you can only have 15 guys on the field at once. New Zealand just isn't producing generational talent ( aside from maybe Jordan or Roigard ) like they have in the past.

              The coaching isn't helping either.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nonpartizanN nonpartizan

                @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

                @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

                I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

                Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" is just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

                True. If it all came down to biggest populations India (for example) would be way better at the Olympics across all disciplines. Culture and intellect play a big part of sporting success.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                brodean
                wrote on last edited by
                #6668

                @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

                @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The vetting needs to be through the roof.

                I think the Black Caps well and truly dismissed that "small country vs big country" nonsense with their 3-0 victory over India ( population over a billion ) IN INDIA......and of those billion people a fair few of them are into Cricket.

                Trotting out the "SA and France have bigger populations" is just not facing up to the fact they are quite simply better at the moment. It's not like their populations have grown by tens of millions in the last few years.

                True. If it all came down to biggest populations India (for example) would be way better at the Olympics across all disciplines. Culture and intellect play a big part of sporting success.

                I don't think intellect has a lot to do with it. David Beckham ain't no genius but boy could he bend that ball.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • nonpartizanN nonpartizan

                  @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                  @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                  I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                  I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                  HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  tubbyj
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #6669

                  @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                  @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                  @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                  I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                  I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                  HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                  Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                  He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                  He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                  MN5M antipodeanA No QuarterN 3 Replies Last reply
                  10
                  • nonpartizanN nonpartizan

                    @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                    @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                    I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                    I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                    HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                    nzzpN Online
                    nzzpN Online
                    nzzp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #6670

                    @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                    think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                    Jamaica: probably drugs

                    B S antipodeanA No QuarterN 4 Replies Last reply
                    2
                    • nzzpN nzzp

                      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                      think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                      Jamaica: probably drugs

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      brodean
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #6671

                      @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

                      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                      think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                      Jamaica: probably drugs

                      All those top athletes are on the juice. Jamaica has really good structures and coaching too for athletics. It's their number one sport.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • nzzpN nzzp

                        @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                        think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                        Jamaica: probably drugs

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        stodders
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #6672

                        @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

                        @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                        think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                        Jamaica: probably drugs

                        NZ should invest in better drugs then 😂

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A akan004

                          @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                          NZ are still in a position with talent production and skill levels that most in the world are envious of.

                          I don't think this is true anymore. How many ABs would make a World XV atm? Possibly only Roigard and even that's highly debatable with Dupont around. Can't think of anyone else.

                          nostrildamusN Offline
                          nostrildamusN Offline
                          nostrildamus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #6673

                          @akan004 said in All Blacks 2025:

                          I don't think this is true anymore. How many ABs would make a World XV atm? Possibly only Roigard and even that's highly debatable with Dupont around. Can't think of anyone else.

                          If Roigard plays to the level of yesterday I'm not sure Dupont is clearly ahead.

                          MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • B brodean

                            @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

                            @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                            @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2025:

                            I disagree. Versus Bok 2 we were still in it with 20 minutes to play. Kolbe's intercept was a game changer.
                            We needed optimum side as stated above and active captain.

                            With a functioning set piece (particularly lineout) that game could and would have been more competitive. I personally think they would still have won but it would have been by a much more respectable score.

                            I agree. Holland is such a lineout weapon (and a decent work rate) he has to start.

                            The lineout was so much better with Taylor and Holland there and with Scooter missing. Vaai and Tuipulotu are both better lineout callers than Scooter too.

                            Holland should be the first lock named and the main 80 minute player. Vaa'i can lose focus if he plays much longer than 60. Paddy, Scooter and Darry can fill in the gaps when they're not injured. I doubt any of those 3 have the bodies now for regular 80 minute test rugby

                            nostrildamusN Offline
                            nostrildamusN Offline
                            nostrildamus
                            wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
                            #6674

                            @brodean said in All Blacks 2025:

                            Holland should be the first lock named and the main 80 minute player. Vaa'i can lose focus if he plays much longer than 60. Paddy, Scooter and Darry can fill in the gaps when they're not injured. I doubt any of those 3 have the bodies now for regular 80 minute test rugby

                            eh? What happened to Darry's conditioning? Has he picked up a longterm injury?

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              upthelanders
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #6675

                              So now that we’ve most likely lost the Rugby Championship, can we start Ruben Love at 10 next week and see what he can do.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                upthelanders
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #6676

                                Also would like to see how Jordie would go at 13. Gives opportunities for guys like Quinn, Leicester (available??) and Jim (injured) to have a start at 12.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • T tubbyj

                                  @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                  @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                                  @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                                  I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                                  I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                  HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                                  Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                                  He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                                  He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #6677

                                  @tubbyj said in All Blacks 2025:

                                  @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                  @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                                  @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                                  I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                                  I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                  HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                                  Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                                  He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                                  He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                                  I wouldn't put this guy in with those guys but agree with a lot of the rest.

                                  KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • MN5M MN5

                                    @tubbyj said in All Blacks 2025:

                                    @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                    @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                                    @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                                    I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                                    I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                    HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                                    Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                                    He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                                    He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                                    I wouldn't put this guy in with those guys but agree with a lot of the rest.

                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurph
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #6678

                                    @MN5 said in All Blacks 2025:

                                    I wouldn't put this guy in with those guys but agree with a lot of the rest.

                                    He's achieved about as much in his test career...... Still waiting for him to have an impact at test level

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • T tubbyj

                                      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                      @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                                      @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                                      I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                                      I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                      HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                                      Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                                      He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                                      He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodeanA Offline
                                      antipodean
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #6679

                                      @tubbyj said in All Blacks 2025:

                                      @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                      @sparky said in All Blacks 2025:

                                      @nonpartizan New Zealand used to have extra rugby smarts to make up for lower player numbers than England, South Africa and France. Not any more.

                                      I expect those three nations with their huge resources to pull away in the next few years.

                                      I think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                      HOWEVER, what you can't afford is waste and inefficiency. Your decision making at all levels of the game have to be very accurate. You need the smartest people in charge making the decisions so that you are always able to use your resources wisely. One bad appointment or poor decision can cripple you. I would say in that sense the AB hiring process for a coach has to be unbelievably thorough next time around. The candidates need to be thoroughly vetted and whatever their weaknesses are there has to be some steps taken to offset them.

                                      Agree waste is a big problem and I can't understand why Jason Ryan gets such a big pass for it. He is the one coach in the setup who has made it obvious he is still stuck in the past where the All Blacks could afford to exclude players with tremendous talent on attitudinal grounds and select players who are not up to it because they have the right attitude.

                                      He is the dumb motherfucker who has excluded 3 of the loose forwards with the most potential talent of their generation in Akira Ioane, Hoskin Sotutu and Dalton Papali'i. Not saying every one of these players would have been a success but a good coach should back himself to get the best out of at least 2 of them. All Black rugby can simply not afford to waste this kind of talent anymore.

                                      He is also the dumb motherfucker who has selected guys not good enough for test rugby like Brodie McCallister, George Bell, Luke Jacobson, Du'Plessis Kirifi while putting to much faith in players like players like Wallace Sititi to be world beaters on the basis of a few Ardie Savea like highlights. Savea is also shit as a 7 and a starter in general and should be on the bench which I put partly on Jason Ryan as well.

                                      Not that I disagree with the central premise of your rant, but my understanding is Razor himself selects the loose forwards.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • nzzpN nzzp

                                        @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                        think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                        Jamaica: probably drugs

                                        antipodeanA Offline
                                        antipodeanA Offline
                                        antipodean
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #6680

                                        @nzzp said in All Blacks 2025:

                                        @nonpartizan said in All Blacks 2025:

                                        think small countries can compete with bigger countries in sport - such as how Jamaica is consistently the biggest rival to the US in sprinting despite having a population of only 3 million.

                                        Jamaica: probably drugs

                                        Definitely drugs.

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                                          @brodean said in All Blacks 2025:

                                          Holland should be the first lock named and the main 80 minute player. Vaa'i can lose focus if he plays much longer than 60. Paddy, Scooter and Darry can fill in the gaps when they're not injured. I doubt any of those 3 have the bodies now for regular 80 minute test rugby

                                          eh? What happened to Darry's conditioning? Has he picked up a longterm injury?

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          brodean
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #6681

                                          @nostrildamus

                                          @nostrildamus said in All Blacks 2025:

                                          @brodean said in All Blacks 2025:

                                          Holland should be the first lock named and the main 80 minute player. Vaa'i can lose focus if he plays much longer than 60. Paddy, Scooter and Darry can fill in the gaps when they're not injured. I doubt any of those 3 have the bodies now for regular 80 minute test rugby

                                          eh? What happened to Darry's conditioning? Has he picked up a longterm injury?

                                          He gets injured every year. Hes basically the same age as Vaa'i but played half the Super games.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search