Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

ABs v Scotland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
536 Posts 67 Posters 45.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    wrote on last edited by
    #373

    @Rocky-Rockbottom @Mokey Keep it coming people. Loving the humour, it is cheering me up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • chimoausC chimoaus

      Can Ioane play fullback and wing at the same time? He is so safe under high ball.

      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamus
      wrote on last edited by
      #374

      @chimoaus said in ABs v Scotland:

      Can Ioane play fullback and wing at the same time? He is so safe under high ball.

      Has Ione played FB? It is an idea, we have enough wingers..

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

        @mokey I don't think he was using it as an excuse. He has a point, there was a growing chorus of people in NZ saying they were bored with AB dominance (some on here may have even said similar things). Now peole are starting to whinge about close AB wins.

        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamus
        wrote on last edited by
        #375

        @crazy-horse yes but they aren't the same people, unless Hansen has some magic powers, how would he know?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • No QuarterN Offline
          No QuarterN Offline
          No Quarter
          wrote on last edited by
          #376

          From a neutral POV, that was a cracking match. The Scots gave it everything and it was a thrilling finish. A "great effort" should be cold comfort for them though, they've had more than enough of those over the years.

          For the ABs, we weathered the storm OK in the first 40. A combination of awesome defense and the Scots dropping the ball kept them from scoring.

          Then in the 2nd 40 we finally worked our way into the game and scored some high quality tries. Rieko was absolutely awesome with ball in hand yet again, he is some player.

          SBW with another grubber leading to a try! Absolutely outrageous stuff.

          The try to Beauden was some next level shit. Great scrum, great SBW offload, great angle from DMac and then the pace of BB to finish. That was a thing of beauty, and I thought it would break the backs of the Scots but we then proceeded to give away about 5 or 6 dumb penalties in a row to keep them in it - that was the most frustrating part of the whole match for me. We just HAVE to improve our discipline, it's brainless stuff that just hands momentum to the opposition.

          @kiwiinmelb mentioned it earlier in the thread but Beauden looks so good when he's in space and running full flight. 10 suits him in looser Super Rugby but he's heavily marked at test level and we are not really utilising his strengths. Think we need to keep him at 10 though, but perhaps SBW could move into first receiver more often with BB setting up a bit wider - might be a good way to give him some space.

          Hames was awesome again. Improving in the loose and making mincemeat of his opposition on a regular basis. Loving his work.

          Thought Naholo was very very lucky to stay on the field. I understand the reasoning for the decision but the duty of care is on Naholo there and he was clumsy at best.

          Overall, very similar to all season - some very good stuff mixed in with some utterly brainless stuff. We're missing a bunch of frontline players but the bloke we're missing most is BBBR. His insane workrate makes it so much easier for everyone around him.

          NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
          6
          • No QuarterN No Quarter

            From a neutral POV, that was a cracking match. The Scots gave it everything and it was a thrilling finish. A "great effort" should be cold comfort for them though, they've had more than enough of those over the years.

            For the ABs, we weathered the storm OK in the first 40. A combination of awesome defense and the Scots dropping the ball kept them from scoring.

            Then in the 2nd 40 we finally worked our way into the game and scored some high quality tries. Rieko was absolutely awesome with ball in hand yet again, he is some player.

            SBW with another grubber leading to a try! Absolutely outrageous stuff.

            The try to Beauden was some next level shit. Great scrum, great SBW offload, great angle from DMac and then the pace of BB to finish. That was a thing of beauty, and I thought it would break the backs of the Scots but we then proceeded to give away about 5 or 6 dumb penalties in a row to keep them in it - that was the most frustrating part of the whole match for me. We just HAVE to improve our discipline, it's brainless stuff that just hands momentum to the opposition.

            @kiwiinmelb mentioned it earlier in the thread but Beauden looks so good when he's in space and running full flight. 10 suits him in looser Super Rugby but he's heavily marked at test level and we are not really utilising his strengths. Think we need to keep him at 10 though, but perhaps SBW could move into first receiver more often with BB setting up a bit wider - might be a good way to give him some space.

            Hames was awesome again. Improving in the loose and making mincemeat of his opposition on a regular basis. Loving his work.

            Thought Naholo was very very lucky to stay on the field. I understand the reasoning for the decision but the duty of care is on Naholo there and he was clumsy at best.

            Overall, very similar to all season - some very good stuff mixed in with some utterly brainless stuff. We're missing a bunch of frontline players but the bloke we're missing most is BBBR. His insane workrate makes it so much easier for everyone around him.

            NepiaN Offline
            NepiaN Offline
            Nepia
            wrote on last edited by Nepia
            #377

            @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

            boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugby
              wrote on last edited by
              #378

              yeah I dont think there was fuck all Naholo could have done differently there, especially with another Scot in between him and the player who went for the ball.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • antipodeanA antipodean

                When does Crockett finally retire? I'm sick of that muppet. Cane's YC was because Crockett shoved him over the ruck.

                StargazerS Offline
                StargazerS Offline
                Stargazer
                wrote on last edited by
                #379

                @antipodean said in ABs v Scotland:

                When does Crockett finally retire? I'm sick of that muppet. Cane's YC was because Crockett shoved him over the ruck.

                His own yellow was stupid, but Crockett had nothing to do with Cane's YC. I just watched it again and if you want to blame anyone else but Cane for his YC, then it's Liam Squire.

                BonesB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • No QuarterN Offline
                  No QuarterN Offline
                  No Quarter
                  wrote on last edited by No Quarter
                  #380

                  @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                  taniwharugbyT NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • No QuarterN No Quarter

                    @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                    taniwharugby
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #381

                    @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                    Although Naholo has hit players in the air before, so it isnt like he is overly cautious when approaching the 'danger zone'

                    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • No QuarterN No Quarter

                      @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                      NepiaN Offline
                      NepiaN Offline
                      Nepia
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #382

                      @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

                      @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                      And as I said, look at the French XV game, the French winger fully tackled an AB in the air and didn't get carded - maybe their is a new normal being established?

                      I don't think he ran aimlessely at all (and I've put the boot into Naholo many teams for his terrible kick chase). Common sense ruled as the impeding Scot player was a clear factor.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                        Although Naholo has hit players in the air before, so it isnt like he is overly cautious when approaching the 'danger zone'

                        No QuarterN Offline
                        No QuarterN Offline
                        No Quarter
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #383

                        @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

                        @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                        Absolutely, when he realised he wasn't going to be able to make a play at the ball he should have stopped running forward. Yup mitigating circumstances but you can't just absolve Naholo of all responsibilty there.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • No QuarterN Offline
                          No QuarterN Offline
                          No Quarter
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #384

                          @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                          NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • No QuarterN No Quarter

                            @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                            NepiaN Offline
                            NepiaN Offline
                            Nepia
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #385

                            @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

                            @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                            I don't think they even told people initially when they first started being anal about it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • T Offline
                              T Offline
                              Talisker
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #386

                              The collision with Hogg in the air was never a card, never in a month of Sundays.

                              However, there were a few repeated penalties as we put pressure on and I don't think seven or eight cards would have been unwarranted - Cane himself should have had at least four ABs binned for the stuff he was getting up to

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NepiaN Nepia

                                @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

                                boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #387

                                @nepia said in ABs v Scotland:

                                @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

                                Surprised they didn't penalise the Jock running obstruction aftr precedent mid-week

                                T 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • boobooB booboo

                                  @nepia said in ABs v Scotland:

                                  @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

                                  Surprised they didn't penalise the Jock running obstruction aftr precedent mid-week

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  Talisker
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #388

                                  @booboo "Jock"

                                  really?

                                  boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Talisker

                                    @booboo "Jock"

                                    really?

                                    boobooB Offline
                                    boobooB Offline
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #389

                                    @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

                                    @booboo "Jock"

                                    really?

                                    Porridge Wog?

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • boobooB booboo

                                      @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

                                      @booboo "Jock"

                                      really?

                                      Porridge Wog?

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Talisker
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #390

                                      @booboo

                                      Colonial?

                                      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Crash
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #391

                                        Can't whinge about the ref. Thought he was ok overall....now Australia on the other hand...
                                        Cane's YC was pretty cynical.
                                        Just wish we would stop doing the dumb stuff. Naholo has a history of tackling players in mid-air. He should be taken aside and given a coaching clinic. Why does he persist in doing this shit? Shag have a word FFS.

                                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Talisker

                                          @booboo "Jock"

                                          really?

                                          boobooB Offline
                                          boobooB Offline
                                          booboo
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #392

                                          @talisker

                                          Genuine question: is that an issue?

                                          Is standard term for Scotsman here (like Boer, Frog, Paddy, Pom).

                                          T boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search